Again, people are individuals. Women and men aren't single entities or hiveminds. If one women is discriminated against the hurt that is causes for her doesn't magically spread throughout the whole of the female population. Likewise, just because men as a whole have discriminated against women more so than women have done so against men doesn't mean that every single man has to be subject to the implications of that and is responsible for said discrimination
It's like vou're saying women discriminating against men isn't sexism because as a whole, women have been subject to more discrimination. Again, that implies that every individual man is responsible as if we're all a hivemind, and goes on the illogical assumption that the overall offended can never offend the overall offenders
Take a man who treats women equally. A woman who he has never met before starts discriminating him because of his gender. Now according to people like you that's not sexism because of what a large amount of his fellow men have done and what a large amount of the women's fellow women have suffered. (btw isn't that the definition of generalisation?)
Ultimately, all discrimination happens on an individual level. Why should innocent people bear the implications of the actions of other members of their group? Yes that does happen, but it's not a desired side affect of society and it directly goes against our ideals of fairness and equality
The ones you rated dumb
Reply to my posts
Instead of giving me boxes, why don't you actually reply?
clever pun title
your parents should be proud
Did it start with an s?
Did you ever post in sh? I swear I've seen someone like you before...
You seem awfully familiar...
You should make like Lankist and be banned forever, only to be unbanned by popular demand, subsequently having your banning be clamored for because everyone realized what a waste of space you are.