I will be tivo-ing the shit out of that.
No use trying to convice idiots. They are stuck in their own world, and will spend their life thinking that the government would blow their own building up.
Although I am a non-believer that WTC was an inside job (although I wouldn't put t past the government to take a dump on its citizens like that; they've been doing it for years) I think one of the most patriotic things an American can do is be skeptical and constantly, completely question the Guv'ment. I think that is the most important lesson from 9/11, is to question authority. The actual conspiracy I feel is unimportant now. We have moved passed that. Now we have the patriot act.
Give it a rest. It's the repercussions "we" need to work out (Patriot act, etc)
For all those involved with the Endeavors and Monetary Gains of War, it did line their pockets, but not as fast as the buildings fall.
Just pointing out that your sarcasm had absolutely no link with my post. I ridicule 9/11 demolition conspiracy theories myself - you made fun of a post which said that I don't think that WTC was demolished.
Good job making yourself look like an idiot once again.
If I was in one of these towers at the time, i'd accept my fate and wait for the buildings to fall. When the began falling, it'd be awesome and sad.
Awesome because I am floating around for a short few seconds, sad because I will only be able to float around for a few seconds, then be crushed.
I've never decided on which one i choose, the credibility of the evidience either side is hazy to say the least
There are fingers pointing in both directions.
There's no way the Bush administration would have been anywhere near smart enough to come up with what the conspiracy theorists claim, let alone the skills to pull it off. I mean come on, its the friggin Bush administration.
Maybe it's built in building safeties? If a building is going to collapse sideways, maybe there's something built in that will cause it to collapse in on itself?
It would seem like a smart thing to do.
Jet fuel can burn at approximately 1000 degrees C.
Steel retains TEN PERCENT of its strength after being heated to approximately 750 degrees C.
Skyscrapers are designed to collapse on themselves and vertically, it's smart city planning.
The government didn't plan 9/11.
You are an idiot if you think this.
it got blown up just like the wtc itself the american government did it.
That train of thought makes sense to some people?
Steel does retain alot of its strength after being heated enough, add the fact that the building didn't have any concrete core.
Yes, scysrapers are designed to implode. I don't care if someones dad is an demolition expert at blowing up any building that are non-skyscrapers.
You can't rule out that the government planned 9/11, though it is higly unlikely that they did. (Like 99% unlikely)
They didn't really have a reason to start it, they already had reasons and the advantages of starting a war with Afghanistan/Iraq. (Barely passable arguements with Afghanistan, but they'd pass due to the fact that they still are the United 'motherfucking' States of 'fucking' America.
Personal Objection below, no need to read if you don't want to read my thoughts.
My guess would be that some powerful chap wanted some important files and documents destroyed, though since it all got destroyed I supose that he got what he wanted in that case. So the whole concept of some dude like the Rockefellers did it should just be ruled out, since there is no evidence to prove that it was any of his doings. (Rockefeller is just an example) it could be anyone, the whole 'World Trade Center' facilities contained alot of important stuff from all around the (guess what!)
You see, the big problem with this "proof" is that, if you look at buildings 6 and 5, notice how much shorter and wider they are compared to what building 7 looked like. A building that is shorter and wider will have a stronger base and less weight to hold up. A taller and skinnier building like building 7 would have been supporting much more weight than the other two, and would be much more likely to collapse. Also, consider that 6 and 5 were crushed from the top down, while the pictures from 7 showed that it suffered a gash on the side. A top down impact wouldn't have compromised the structure because the supports that were destroyed were destroyed along with the floors above them, so all of the floors that were not destroyed still had intact supports. The gash on 7 would have taken out the supports, but the floors above them would still be there, making the building unable to hold up its own weight, and imploding.OP posted:
This is common sense people, how hard is that?
we can rule out FreeThinker as either extremely closed-minded or a troll
imasillypiggy, I gotta say out of everybody on this forum I hate you the most
your typing makes me want to cut my eyes out and your arguments have evidence 0% of the time
it's not any of your beliefs specifically, it's just how you act like an eleven-year-old and refuse to leave your little thought-shelter and accept anyone else's opinion
you've contributed nothing to this thread debate-wise and nothing anyone does will change the way your eleven-year-old mind thinks
make an account without a retarded name and come back in five years, ok?
I'm not going to talk Politics anymore, it's mostly opinion anyway. I'm a bit better with this WTC stuff since it's all based in the realm of physics and facts.
not a pun . There's always someone with the complete opposite mindset that's very, very vocal about it.
I stay the hell away from In The News now.
lol im pstn frm phone i m crsh plene into u r hous lol
You should do some investigating, Pull records of employees that worked there. Check for criminals or people of significant value or disvalue to the USA.
I'm assuming your a local? I live in UK so Investigating my be difficult but maybe interesting also.
If you find a VERY important fact, Go Public Immediatly or else "Certain Powers" may try and stop you.
If you look at the towers collapsing you can see a sequence of explosions going off at an almost timed sequence. It seems somebody over looked this?
The true story about what happened to WTC7:
WTC7 came home to find all of his brothers dead so he committed suicide.
I just highlighted something looking suspisous, why were the 2 buildings labeled "WTC" flattened when there were buildings that are closer and were unscaved?
It effected the whole western world! The United Kingdom and United States Military Forces were deployed almost instantly to Afghanistan to chase Osama Bin-faggot.
From the neutral point of view, I think the terrorists won this. They bomb some of the most important financial buildings in the western world, they cause our Populations to be shocked by terror demorilising the public. It lead to our young Men and Women being sent out to fight a nearly unwinnable war. ever weak we see another soldier being send home in a bodybag, the media globalises it, spreading more "terror" through-out the population.
The only way we can win this war is if one of our leaders has enough nads to press the BIG RED BUTTON! and turn there shithole caves to glass hallways!