[Miljaker]

Started internship yesterday. Did nothing but set up git first day because they had no work planned for me. And today I made one whole ribbon and changed some css properties of a few container divs. And by the looks of it my co-workers didn't do much more. Is the whole webdev business world so "lazy"?

[fritzel]

^^some are in for money and others because of their interest.

[KmartSqrl]

Miljaker posted:

Started internship yesterday. Did nothing but set up git first day because they had no work planned for me. And today I made one whole ribbon and changed some css properties of a few container divs. And by the looks of it my co-workers didn't do much more. Is the whole webdev business world so "lazy"?

Nope

[C:\]

http://81.178.239.49/

who needs consistent navbar item sizes

[jung3o]

C:\ posted:

http://81.178.239.49/

who needs consistent navbar item sizes

make it so you still select it when hovering over the icons.

[C:\]

jung3o posted:

make it so you still select it when hovering over the icons.

Doing it now, give me a sec.

this may take a while, i must rearrange a bunch of shit

Edited:

    <script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript">
      $(document).ready(function() {
        $('#homeImg').mouseover(function(){
          $('#nav ul li a.firstItem').css('background-color', 'rgba(200,50,40,0.9)');
        });
        $('#homeImg').mouseout(function(){
          $('#nav ul li a.firstItem').css('background-color', 'rgba(0,0,0,0)');
        });
        $('#nav ul li a.firstItem').mouseover(function(){
          $('#nav ul li a.firstItem').css('background-color', 'rgba(200,50,40,0.9)');
        });
        $('#nav ul li a.firstItem').mouseout(function(){
          $('#nav ul li a.firstItem').css('background-color', 'rgba(0,0,0,0)');
        });
      });

this is the worst thing i have ever done
and i have to do it for every single nav item
oh god

Well at least my teacher will grade me well, everyone else in my class is just making the site design in fireworks, then slicing it up and sticking it in dreamweaver.

edit: http://pastebin.com/LnSwPyLu
coder of the year

edit: I just made a solution in like 8 lines of CSS.
fuck

[antiChrist]

Is it too horrible?

[Slater]

The font is. I found it hard to read. Also, having pictures of servers that aren't yours is a bit dodgy (False advertising, etc).

Look at where it says "Pre-order a server today!" and look at the R on 'Server', for an example of why proof reading is important. Other than that, it's clean and it looks fine.

_Edited:
Aaaaaaaaaactually, there's quite a few typos.

[antiChrist]

Slater posted:

The font is. I found it hard to read. Also, having pictures of servers that aren't yours is a bit dodgy (False advertising, etc).

Look at where it says "Pre-order a server today!" and look at the R on 'Server', for an example of why proof reading is important. Other than that, it's clean and it looks fine.

_Edited:
Aaaaaaaaaactually, there's quite a few typos.

I found this on my web archive, I was probably high when I made it.

[Slater]

antiChrist posted:

I found this on my web archive, I was probably high when I made it.

Oh. That explains that then! Even still, for a completely baked-off-your-face-all-you-can-see-is-colours-floating-around-the-room mental state, it's not terrible!

[antiChrist]

Also, something old that I made.

http://xoom3r.net/lab/fog/

[Ac!dL3ak]

antiChrist posted:

Also, something old that I made.

http://xoom3r.net/lab/fog/

I remember that

[blinkblink]

TerabyteS_ posted:

too late i stole it

ok ifaux

[TerabyteS_]

Here's our simple private todo tracker for in-house development (written by Jelly, styled by me)

[TehWhale]

That's beautiful!

[Kopimi]

tera what language are you guys using for the backend of Amuzor?

[blinkblink]

TerabyteS_ posted:

Here's our simple private todo tracker for in-house development (written by Jelly, styled by me)

mother of god

[antiChrist]

Ac!dL3ak posted:

I remember that

I don't remember posting it, but heh, I've been pretty high that last few weeks.

I don't even.

[blinkblink]

antiChrist posted:

Is it too horrible?

i actually really like that wow

[usa]

TerabyteS_ posted:

Here's our simple private todo tracker for in-house development (written by Jelly, styled by me)

hot but the happy face in the corner makes me cringe.

[Jelly]

Kopimi posted:

tera what language are you guys using for the backend of Amuzor?

Node/Coffeescript.

usa posted:

hot but the happy face in the corner makes me cringe.

Likewise but it fits our demographic.

[wizard`]

TerabyteS_ posted:

Here's our simple private todo tracker for in-house development (written by Jelly, styled by me)

No priority management? No subtasks? Can't assign tasks to team members?

I expected more from you guys

I'm all jokes of course it looks good but a little under-featured imo, if you are going to go to the trouble of writing the todo list into the actual site you might as well go all the way with it

[Jelly]

wizard` posted:

No priority management? No subtasks? Can't assign tasks to team members?

I expected more from you guys

I'm all jokes of course it looks good but a little under-featured imo, if you are going to go to the trouble of writing the todo list into the actual site you might as well go all the way with it

It was written in 10 minutes because our Basecamp subscription ran out and we're too poor to pay $50 a month.

[wizard`]

Jelly posted:

It was written in 10 minutes because our Basecamp subscription ran out and we're too poor to pay $50 a month.

I wasn't hating, it looks good I was just a little confused at first. Also why not just use Asana if your basecamp ran out? doesn't matter now though

[anton]

Jelly posted:

Node/Coffeescript.

Any particular reason you chose Node over something like Rails, etc?

[Jelly]

anton posted:

Any particular reason you chose Node over something like Rails, etc?

I dislike Ruby and prefer Javascript/Coffeescript. Later on we plan to have a lot of real time web sockets stuff going on so it was the sane choice.

[Ac!dL3ak]

Jelly posted:

I dislike Ruby and prefer Javascript/Coffeescript. Later on we plan to have a lot of real time web sockets stuff going on so it was the sane choice.

I prefer ruby over javascript/coffeescript, javascript just seems so unorganized and coffeescript is too much. Also, I'd be extremely surprised if you couldn't find a socket.io implementation in ruby.

[Jelly]

Ac!dL3ak posted:

I prefer ruby over javascript/coffeescript, javascript just seems so unorganized and coffeescript is too much. Also, I'd be extremely surprised if you couldn't find a socket.io implementation in ruby.

All the implementations I've seen are foul and inconsistent. When you start trying to do asynchronous events on a synchronous language it turns into a clusterfuck. Look at em-websocket for example:

EventMachine.run {

    EventMachine::WebSocket.start(:host => "0.0.0.0", :port => 8080) do |ws|
        ws.onopen {
          puts "WebSocket connection open"

          # publish message to the client
          ws.send "Hello Client"
        }

        ws.onclose { puts "Connection closed" }
        ws.onmessage { |msg|
          puts "Recieved message: #{msg}"
          ws.send "Pong: #{msg}"
        }
    end
}

[Ac!dL3ak]

Jelly posted:

All the implementations I've seen are foul and inconsistent. When you start trying to do asynchronous events on a synchronous language it turns into a clusterfuck. Look at em-websocket for example:

EventMachine.run {

    EventMachine::WebSocket.start(:host => "0.0.0.0", :port => 8080) do |ws|
        ws.onopen {
          puts "WebSocket connection open"

          # publish message to the client
          ws.send "Hello Client"
        }

        ws.onclose { puts "Connection closed" }
        ws.onmessage { |msg|
          puts "Recieved message: #{msg}"
          ws.send "Pong: #{msg}"
        }
    end
}

whats wrong with that code?

[Jelly]

Ac!dL3ak posted:

whats wrong with that code?

It's trying to do asynchronous events on a language that wasn't designed for it.

[Ac!dL3ak]

Jelly posted:

It's trying to do asynchronous events on a language that wasn't designed for it.

[citations needed]

[Jelly]

Ac!dL3ak posted:

[citations needed]

Is it that disputable that Ruby was designed to be synchronous?

[usa]

(document).ready is dead use waitUntilExists.

its much faster

also I can't believe I never saw the usefulness of this

Edited:

also flexboxes are awesome

[_Undefined]

Just finished converting my database class to use PDO instead of MySQLi. I don't understand why the old mysql_* functions even exist any more.

[Ac!dL3ak]

Jelly posted:

Is it that disputable that Ruby was designed to be synchronous?

what the fuck are blocks for? they function very similar to anonymous functions, and i'll be damned if you can't do Thread.new do end.

[Jelly]

Ac!dL3ak posted:

what the fuck are blocks for? they function very similar to anonymous functions, and i'll be damned if you can't do Thread.new do end.

What do blocks or anonymous functions have to do with anything? Basically all scripting languages have them, asynchronous or not. Ruby threads are barely asynchronous, not to mention they're prone to locking and also suffer from thread starvation.

[saming]

Jelly posted:

Node/Coffeescript.

I'd like to start using Node but I've read people saying it's genius and people saying it's not usable.
What can I believe now, honestly ?

[Jelly]

saming posted:

I'd like to start using Node but I've read people saying it's genius and people saying it's not usable.
What can I believe now, honestly ?

Try to dabble in it a bit to see if you like it, Express has the lowest learning curve.

[Creepy]

Just finished a simple HTML/CSS/PHP page that works with the SMF forums for a small community.

(I don't like how it really looks but its what he wanted me to make and you know the customers always right.)



But my main project right now is working on SpikeWess.com


I got all the major functions working, just need to style it all. Right now we can't seem to figure out
a design that best suits the content. (Reason why there are colored boxes are so we can see the layout)
But we are messing with a few things left a right so hopefully it will look nice. What do you guys think?

NOTE: The only thing done with the spikewess.com is the layout no styling has been made yet.

[nehkz]

So, I'm working on re-working my website. I'm going from this:http://nehkz.me to http://nehkz.me/img/i/f5183727f58912...48f1e0f488.png (Obviously just a photoshop mockup for now)

What do you think?