[Orkel]

The efficiency mod really shows the average skill of players.

*k = amount of battles rounded to the nearest thousand (0k = less than 500 battles)
After that comes efficiency according to this chart (a pretty accurate indicator of skill)
And lastly the win ratio which is p useless



I feel like playing amidst a bunch of monkeys. Enemy löwes too, one has 200 fucking efficiency, how can someone be that useless every match. And note how few battles both enemy löwes have, bought themselves from low tiers to high and it shows.

Edit: The enemy KV with 177 efficiency was the first one to die.

[Nexosz]

there was a kv with the big-ass turret and a stock gun wtf

Edited:

Orkel posted:

The efficiency mod really shows the average skill of players.

*k = amount of battles rounded to the nearest thousand (0k = less than 500 battles)
After that comes efficiency according to this chart (a pretty accurate indicator of skill)
And lastly the win ratio which is p useless



I feel like playing amidst a bunch of monkeys. Enemy löwes too, one has 200 fucking efficiency, how can someone be that useless every match. And note how few battles both enemy löwes have, bought themselves from low tiers to high and it shows.

Edit: The enemy KV with 177 efficiency was the first one to die.

Efficiency rating
4268.8
are you sure this chart works

[Ogopogo]

Awesomecaek posted:

It just has absolutely nothing to offer over the other T9 mediums.

I won't have this argument again, and yes, it's a T9, it's playable, it can ruin everything T8 and lower due to the massive DPS, but it is slowest of all the mediums, only BatChat having worse armor, and it's gun has horrible accuracy, it's highest DPS completely overshadowed by BatChat's autoloader.

All other mediums seem to have SOMETHING that makes them excel. T-54 can ding tier X guns with it's front and it's turret and it's rather agile and fast, E-50's armor is downright bullshit, while having a pin-point accurate gun, BatChat is... well, a fucking OP piece of french rape.

Patton has... view range, on the move accuracy which it can't really use because it's not really fast nor agile, and slightly SLIGHTLY higher DPM than others (which is known to be pointless anyway)

Yeah, the patton is rather underwhelming. I regularly take them down in my mini-patton (the chaffee) with little to no problems. There isn't much that the Patton offers (besides a big gun, and a lot of health) that the chaffee does not provide. Sure the armor might bounce something, but it still way below the threshold of being useful.

[Orkel]

Nexosz posted:

there was a kv with the big-ass turret and a stock gun wtf

Edited:



Efficiency rating
4268.8
are you sure this chart works

You did something wrong. I used your nick and it gave 802.

[kirederf7]

Will there ever be a realistic mode or a historical mode?

[Nexosz]

Orkel posted:

You did something wrong. I used your nick and it gave 802.

type troots

[Trunk Monkay]

kirederf7 posted:

Will there ever be a realistic mode or a historical mode?

they've talked about it in the past but I think they're more concerned with hitting the EU servers with hammers until matchmaking gets better.

[Orkel]

Nexosz posted:

type troots

Your ingame nick is trooters though isn't it

"troots" is some random guy who has played like 3 battles and that has skewed the rating, there's not enough to get a proper reading off of

http://worldoftanks.eu/community/acc...641685-troots/

[Nexosz]

a question
what does it mean when someone has a bright blue / cyan name

Orkel posted:

Your ingame nick is trooters though isn't it

"troots" is some random guy who has played like 3 battles and that has skewed the rating, there's not enough to get a proper reading off of

http://worldoftanks.eu/community/acc...641685-troots/

troots - me from the beta stage of wot i forgot my account details

but still it has better skill than you ha (with only an ms1)

[Orkel]

Nexosz posted:

a question
what does it mean when someone has a bright blue / cyan name

he is a teamkiller, and you are free to kill him without any punishment (it gives you -1 kills, but you get no fines etc + the system doesn't tag you as a teamkiller)

it's worth it

[ze beaver]

Orkel posted:

he is a teamkiller, and you are free to kill him without any punishment (it gives you -1 kills, but you get no fines etc + the system doesn't tag you as a teamkiller)

it's worth it

I got fined last time I killed a cyan Pershing, it was too tempting to stick a 203 shell in his ass

[cpt.armadillo]

I am 497 or so efficiency :smith:

[DEANO90]

1257, Wow, I thought I was a shit player...

[Orkel]

ze beaver posted:

I got fined last time I killed a cyan Pershing, it was too tempting to stick a 203 shell in his ass

I didn't get any fines when blasting a cyan KV-3 the last time I saw one :x

[superkickass]

53 hits in my amx 40....

[Bonde]

So I finally tried that efficiency rating Orkel posted and I got a rating of 1035.76 (Average as fuck). It is kinda thought through though, since permium users doesn't get better scores than peasant users, because average exp isn't part of the calculation.

It still can't take the extremely poor matchmaking into account, but that would also be nigh impossible.

I should soon have enough exp to unlock the T-43, but I'm still very short of silver and I don't like to sell my precious tanks. I might be forced to sell one though, because I don't think I have a free slot.

[Saza]

700 efficiency or so

w/e like I give a fuck

[joost1120]

Ha! 800 efficiency! Take that!

I bet it came from the grinding to the KV though.

[Doom14]

1220.63

Here I was thinking I was peasant tier for just being happy that my victories (864) finally overcame my defeats (860)

[Awesomecaek]

1259.76

[gunnars1]

1481.31

Borderline great player hnngg.

[Zombii]

1224.86

I'm "good"
vv

[Trunk Monkay]

1291.42
check it

[Mastahamma]

Not this shit again, I thought we had gone through this already.

[Trunk Monkay]

Mastahamma posted:

Not this shit again, I thought we had gone through this already.

we have, but its good to reassure our selves we're better than the hordes of shit in this terrible community.

[Mastahamma]

Trunk Monkay posted:

we have, but its good to reassure our selves we're better than the hordes of shit in this terrible community.

i.e. wave our dicks in the cold winter breeze

[DEANO90]

Well, the last time I checked it, I was around 800

[cpt.armadillo]

I'm the worst here :saddowns:

[GravyKing]

976 "Average". What really hurt me was having that 15+ losing streak in the Lowe.

[fishyfish777]

On one hand I want to run the efficiency mod due to the fact that I want to know which tanks are more of a priority to kill but on the other hand I don't want to know when my team's made out of such fail that we're going to lose without one enemy kill


Although I'm pretty content with being upgraded to 1370 over my last rating of around 1250

[Orkel]

Bonde posted:

It still can't take the extremely poor matchmaking into account, but that would also be nigh impossible.

According to the law of large numbers, it will average itself out. So the more battles you have, the less matchmaking affects the efficiency rating.

[Doom14]

GravyKing posted:

976 "Average". What really hurt me was having that 15+ losing streak in the Lowe.

You want to know the luck my Lowe has? DO YOU WANT TO KNOW?



I can write off the Tiger as not knowing how to play it and the horrible grind of the stock version. Some other low tanks there are grinds, suicide rushes and me being bad at them. The Lowe? I constantly get horrible teams. I'm almost always the last one left with 2-5 kills while the rest of my team has maybe one. Or two. Combined.

The 7 Kamikaze medals, on the other hand, are my pride and joy. My end goal for this game is to unlock everything and earn 100 Kamikaze medals.

[NuclearDwarf]

1335.7

i'm okay with this

[acidcj]

I just got tk'd for the second round in a row in my wolverine...

[Drag#!]

1078.66
Meh, didn't expect much better.

[acidcj]

1201? Last I checked I was ~900. I must be getting better....

[kirederf7]

acidcj posted:

1201? Last I checked I was ~900. I must be getting better....

I went up about 100 points!

[Amplar]

1554, woo

top 3% of players

[fishyfish777]

What I want to see is a mod showing in-tank winratios. I don't care if the guy has a low winrate in his A-20 or Hummel that screws up his total winrate, what I care about is how well he does in the tank he's currently using.

[kirederf7]

fishyfish777 posted:

What I want to see is a mod showing in-tank winratios. I don't care if the guy has a low winrate in his A-20 or Hummel that screws up his total winrate, what I care about is how well he does in the tank he's currently using.

Would be sweet but I rather see the efficiency rating of the tank.

This tool is amazing :

http://wot-dossier.appspot.com/

The efficiency rating of my PzKpfw 38H735 is 2966.5