Yes, but it could be positioned better.
That being said, I'm just saying what little crit I have of the photo, it's excellent nevertheless.
Yes, but it could be positioned better.
That being said, I'm just saying what little crit I have of the photo, it's excellent nevertheless.
keep out by kopimi, on Flickr
terrible HDR mountain by kopimi, on Flickr
erased by kopimi, on Flickr
fenced in by kopimi, on Flickr
another cheap HDR pic by kopimi, on Flickr
monolithic by kopimi, on Flickr
post by kopimi, on Flickr
tried messing with RAW data, making bigger changes to temp, exposure, vibrance and stuff like that. trying to make pics look nice without treading into tacky/cliche/overdone territory. also did HDR but im afraid im overdoing it esp with the "another cheap HDR pic" one of the field and the sky.
IMGP9636.jpg by Inzalonus, on Flickr
not sure, tried to mess around with a high contrast post, dunno if I really like it..
I used startrails.exe to see how well it does the startrail thing, and that was the result.
I like it, very nice colours, but I can't help but notice the amount of noise in the image. A little noise reduction wouldn't hurt. I can't decide whether or not I like the foreground leaves. Oh well, it's a great picture so that's what matters.
pretty sure that's film grain
i really like it the way it is actually
6x6 exposure, Portra 160 expired 2008.
Film grain indeed.
Oh, I didn't know you used film Blaze, sorry bout that :/
Edited:
What the flying fuck is this? Did you ram some random chemicals into a lighter?
My favourite tennis player:
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga by edwin.quast, on Flickr
I can't wait until I finish working. By August, I would have worked 49 days out of the last 56. With an average shift of 12 hours a day.
Bring on the summer. Looking forwards to being able to edit and post the shit ton of a backlog I've built up in the past few months. Big Love guys.
P.S. I know there's a greenish/yellow colour cast, but It's been edited as part of a bigger series for my colleagues at Wimbledon to be put on facebook. They love that hipster shit innit.
Hey guys.. it's been some time since I last posted here.
I haven't touched my camera for a few months now.. but just two days ago I went to Italy and had some nice days.
Spent the better half of today reading through this thread (currently at page 66) and you guys just posted amazing pictures.
I ditched flickr in favor of 500px and made a small Userscript that gives me the flickr style bb code:
Italian streets by LuaStoned on 500px
Will post the finished script tomorrow along with some other photos.
G'night!
I spent about an hour yesterday in my schools darkroom with about 300 glowsticks :)
sbip
chill out bro
Edited:
yeah it is silly to ignore the content of the photo and talk about noise though
IMGP9193.jpg by Inzalonus, on Flickr
meh
Omg. That sounds so fun..
Just spontaneously bought a Canon EOS 650 on ebay for £8.
I also didn't mean to post it in this thread and why is this funny
You can't imagine the hilarity!
£8? How does this happen!?
I meant to post these yesterday, but I was in a rush and forgot until just recently.
I was out around Gothenburg yesterday and shot some photos.
Pollutioned by E the Swede, on Flickr
Boatin' n' Liftin' by E the Swede, on Flickr
Big Fat Boat by E the Swede, on Flickr
Publicly Marine by E the Swede, on Flickr
Full Sail by E the Swede, on Flickr
T' Lipstick by E the Swede, on Flickr
Life n' Death by E the Swede, on Flickr
(Had to cheat with the blur on this one, and lazily at that. Sorry. It drove by so quickly I didn't have time to fiddle with the settings.)
Summer Cooloff by E the Swede, on Flickr
Narrow by E the Swede, on Flickr
There's some more shots on the Flickr page. I liked these the most. Don't want to stretch the page too badly. Although, y'know. It kinda is already.
I don't know, i just ebayed it and found it for £8, pretty good deal.
Oh, for a second there I was mixed up between the 650D, now realizing it's the 650 film SLR. Still a good deal though haha
:O by TiMbl4, on Flickr
IMG_4031-2 by TiMbl4, on Flickr
<3 by TiMbl4, on Flickr
IMG_3968-2 by TiMbl4, on Flickr
IMG_4008-1 by TiMbl4, on Flickr
IMG_4066-5 by TiMbl4, on Flickr
got my first roll of film back! came out alright i guess, a few under/over exposed shots.. one which I'm really sad was under exposed but hey ho life goes on!
Nothing really flashy, just getting to grips with the camera and all that malarky - more in this set: Film
..Do you guess if it's going to be exposed or not? Like, this has always bothered me. Is film different to digital in this respect?
well my camera has a built in exposure meter but it doesn't work, assuming the batteries for it are just flat then it will be fine when i get some more but other than that it's all guess work!
If the camera was made after the late sixties, it will probably have a (maybe working) light meter. That or get a separate, hand-held light meter.
However with film you can still capture a lot more information if you over/under expose than with a digital sensor. Depending on how much over or under exposed the photo was, and also depending on the film, if you scan it right you still get all the data and can make it look like it was almost fine.
Edited:
In other words if you have to guess it it can still turn out fine
Edited:
For example, disposable film cameras usually have a single pre-set shutter speed and aperture size, and you can still get usable photos in different lighting
It does have one but it's either broken or just flat batteries. How would i go about sorting it out, the roll that had the one shot i wanted that was underexposed has already been developed but i have the negatives
Love this one buddy
![]()
Not sure how I feel about the missed focus on the eyes. I like the jacket being sharp and the photo works like that, but I just have a subconscious need for the eyes to be in focus!
Either way, dat expression. And the hair fix with her fingers like that is coooool.
she applied her eyeliner unevenly
A little back story on that photo of my friend, Zoe. Zoe absolutely HATES her photo being taken, you can't even imagine the difficulty of getting a photo of her! We were sat in photography class, I was fiddling with my camera and she was sat doing some annotations on her coursework and with her head down I decided to focus on her but I couldn't seem to get a decent focus on her hair so I focused on her jacket. With the aperture being on f/5.6 I thought it would keep everything in focus but turns out it didn't! As for the pose, her fringe is at a length that when she looks down to write it flops onto her work so she holds it back with her non-writing hand, this is something she's always done and is a bit of a characteristic of her now and once I had everything ready to take the shot I said her name and in the moment she looked up I clicked the shutter. The moment she saw the camera she covered her face and looked down so the shot you see is literally the split second of her reaction time between her eyes looking down the lens and then hiding away and because of this I was so dubious of whether the shot would come out because of how fast she hid but it came out perfectly. Probably the luckiest candid shot I've ever taken.
baa
Sheep by Jack_Fisher, on Flickr
I went to several places in Scotland
A well known place St. Peter's Seminary
St Peter's Seminary by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
St Peter's Seminary by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
St Peter's Seminary by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
St Peter's Seminary by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
A less known place which is a Paper Mill in Guardbridge.
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
It actually had its own power station which was nice and full of asbestos-y goodness
Guardbridge Paper Mill byCommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Guardbridge Paper Mill by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
It was a very interesting place.
We also visited the derelict village Polphail, fairly boring but the graffiti was rather well done.
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
The co-ordinates if you ever want to visit
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
Polphail by CommunistWolf, on Flickr
It was a good weekend away especially as far as Urban Exploration goes
C&C is welcome
use the sunny 16 rule to calculate exposure. if it is sunny outside, your aperture will be f16, and your shutter speed will mimic your film speed. so if you were using 200 film, it would be something like 1/250 and f16. then just calculate your exposure from there, like wanting wider aperture you would lower the shutter. so you end up with 1/1000 (typical top for film cameras of the 70's) f5.6.
or just use your g2 to get your exposure, and calculate your camera accordingly. mirrorless are good for lightmetering as you get a good idea of what it will look like without following the built in meter
cheers trog, i have been using my g2 for metering (just putting it on P and seeing what it says), but thanks for the extra info!!