Rule 1 of Music on the internet: Pitchfork is shite and should never be trusted
Always lived by this, doin' just fine
are ya?
half of the idiots on /mu/ and THUS ON OUR OWN MUSIC SECTION (god forbid we form our own opinions) just follow the shit they spew. People cite their reviews to show how they are "wrong" or what have you but all of the opinion pieces on there and discussions have the same view on most albums. Without them none of you dolts would know who the fuck bon iver is or half of these other guys.
Edited:
Didn't they make that album the best of 2000. Makes no sense.
see this is what you people don't understand at all about journalism. the site is run by a group of people and managed by an editor. reviews are written by ONE PERSON, they do not reflect the thoughts of anyone else writing or working for the site/magazine in any capacity. That review is just a one off where the guy writing it clearly didn't get that Andrew WAS in fact being ironic, the joke went over his head in the same way the fact that many punk and metal bands are not being serious at all. It isn't the craziest thing in the world, and the fact it showed up on their "best of 2000" list shows that the opinion of one reviewer on the site doesn't reflect a thing.
Edited:
and fyi bon iver was literally made by pitchfork. they are the ONLY reason anyone knows of him at all.