I am saying I disagree with it. How damn hard is it for you to understand that?
Whether or not their drunk, if a person says yes, they say yes. Or should be able to be held to that yes.
In my opinion. I understand that isn't the law. Hell, everyone in this thread understands that is the law: everyone that is speaking against it is saying it should not be this way, not that it is not this way.
If a person, who is under the influence, agrees to supply minors with alcohol, is he good to go, or is he able to be charged with providing minors in possession?
If you answer yes, I hate you.
My argument is not that it isn't this way, it is that it should not be this way.
Sorry I came back, but you seem to have misunderstood, so I needed to clarify. Maybe this time I can stay away?