1. Post #2081
    Goblin_5's Avatar
    January 2012
    373 Posts
    I don't get how the IS-8 is about the same size as a Pz.IV, is it crewed by gnomes.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Finland Show Events Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  2. Post #2082
    Dumb britbong
    C0MMUNIZT's Avatar
    April 2011
    1,918 Posts
    I don't get how the IS-8 is about the same size as a Pz.IV, is it crewed by gnomes.
    Its alot longer and wider then a panzer 4.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events

  3. Post #2083
    Gold Member
    zom_bie's Avatar
    July 2005
    627 Posts
    whoring myself out to the goons has gone well




    I regret nothing
    No matter what you say, the T110 spam you did was in no way a tactic and you should feel very very bad.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events Agree Agree x 2 (list)

  4. Post #2084
    "Gold Member"
    Dennab
    May 2007
    13,705 Posts
    going nearly single file up through the bushes and using the lights to cover our advance certainly was
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  5. Post #2085
    acidcj's Avatar
    March 2010
    4,000 Posts
    you abandoned us for gold, you're a bad person and you should feel bad
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux United States Show Events Agree Agree x 8Disagree Disagree x 2 (list)

  6. Post #2086
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    Goldmember revocation. Now.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events Agree Agree x 5Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  7. Post #2087
    tonks erryday
    Orkel's Avatar
    January 2005
    25,841 Posts
    I don't get how the IS-8 is about the same size as a Pz.IV, is it crewed by gnomes.
    Russian tankers are gnomes.

    Here's a reporter shaking the hands of the 3-man crew of a T-90.

    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Show Events Funny Funny x 13 (list)

  8. Post #2088
    "Gold Member"
    Dennab
    May 2007
    13,705 Posts
    In other news I completely rapestopped an entire advance of 6 guys at north bridge on swamp with my T-34/57. Got less than 1000exp (+ the 5x) afterwards though, for 5 kills and tons of damage...

    http://filesmelt.com/dl/20120509_134...ough.wotreplay


    Definitely worth a watch to see the T-34/57 machine gun in action.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  9. Post #2089
    tonks erryday
    Orkel's Avatar
    January 2005
    25,841 Posts
    I hate the KV-4. What a waste of credits.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Show Events Informative Informative x 5Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  10. Post #2090
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    Yeah I should have pointed out it has like 46% winrate on russian servers, and you have to consider only people who have it really wanted it and were most probably ready for it.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events

  11. Post #2091
    "Gold Member"
    Dennab
    May 2007
    13,705 Posts
    ...so I shouldn't get the KV-4?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  12. Post #2092
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    ...so I shouldn't get the KV-4?
    Nope.

    It's basically germanized KV-5.

    It sacrifices KV-5s ramtastic speed and side/back armor for higher penetration and mostly weak-point less front armor.

    It leads to IS-4 which is (in comparison to T110) a mediocre tier 10 and ST-1 isn't as awesome as IS-8, so yeah, it's pointless.

    Edited:

    Even closer comparison would be King Tiger. KV-4 has overall better armor (with bigger weakspot on top of the turret, still analogical to KTs commander cupola, while sides and back of both the hull and turret are significantly better), less agility and slightly (mostly just worse accuracy) worse gun.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events

  13. Post #2093
    acidcj's Avatar
    March 2010
    4,000 Posts
    Awesome, I'll sell my KV-3 then, I could use the credits
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux United States Show Events

  14. Post #2094
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    I don't think KV-4 is necessarily bad, as I said, it's basically a bastard between KT and KV-5.

    But it's not something I would recommend as a tank to get for recreational play.

    And considering there isn't much of reason for why to go for IS-4 now, just don't bother and go for IS-7, as that has the glorious IS-8 and IS-3 under itself, which are all more loyal to the Soviet spirit.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events Agree Agree x 2 (list)

  15. Post #2095
    Gold Member
    Raidyr's Avatar
    February 2007
    23,696 Posts
    As someone who is just looking at the numbers and fighting the tanks, one soviet tree looks really good and the other one is pretty mediocre.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events

  16. Post #2096
    "Gold Member"
    Dennab
    May 2007
    13,705 Posts
    Well I already have the IS-7 and IS-4 I was just going to get the KV-4 for hilarious rams and stuff



    Wait what happened to its top gun? Top gun right now is improved 107, wasn't it supposed to have a 120 or something
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  17. Post #2097
    N-12_Aden's Avatar
    April 2011
    2,790 Posts
    Well shit, I was looking forward to the buffed KV-3.

    Maybe I have enough cash to start the other line.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  18. Post #2098
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    Well I already have the IS-7 and IS-4 I was just going to get the KV-4 for hilarious rams and stuff



    Wait what happened to its top gun? Top gun right now is improved 107, wasn't it supposed to have a 120 or something
    "130mm howitzer" :/

    To be honest, I think the single and only blow the tank needed was decreasing the top speed from 50 to 30.

    50 would simply make it worth it just for the 700dmg-to-t10-tanks. 30 barely allows you to ram anything but lighter medium tanks.

    Edited:

    Platooning with Orkel

    Defeat
    Battle: Steppes Wednesday, May 09, 2012 9:15:00 PM
    Vehicle: IS-4
    Experience received: 1,162
    Credits received: 94,159
    Edited:

    I had 5 kills, he had 4. We still lost obviously.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events Agree Agree x 4 (list)

  19. Post #2099
    Dumb Americunt
    MadCatMkII's Avatar
    May 2010
    8,834 Posts
    "130mm howitzer" :/

    To be honest, I think the single and only blow the tank needed was decreasing the top speed from 50 to 30.

    50 would simply make it worth it just for the 700dmg-to-t10-tanks. 30 barely allows you to ram anything but lighter medium tanks.
    So the KV-4 went the way of the E-75 when it was in test then?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Netherlands Show Events

  20. Post #2100
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    So the KV-4 went the way of the E-75 when it was in test then?
    Dunno about that.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events

  21. Post #2101
    Gold Member
    Raidyr's Avatar
    February 2007
    23,696 Posts
    I had 5 kills, he had 4. We still lost obviously.
    Yeah yesterday platooning with Tiger II in my M26, we got 5 kills between us and lost. Not as good as yours but still, 900 on a defeat stings.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events

  22. Post #2102
    Azaz3l's Avatar
    April 2010
    1,993 Posts
    Well I already have the IS-7 and IS-4 I was just going to get the KV-4 for hilarious rams and stuff



    Wait what happened to its top gun? Top gun right now is improved 107, wasn't it supposed to have a 120 or something
    KV-4's top gun is crap. It has a really low RoF for a 107mm and the whole tank is big as fuck.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 France Show Events

  23. Post #2103
    MendozaMan's Avatar
    April 2007
    4,962 Posts
    Not getting KV-4 it seems, as WG ruined it and it should be a tier lower.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Belgium Show Events

  24. Post #2104
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    KV-4's top gun is crap. It has a really low RoF for a 107mm and the whole tank is big as fuck.
    It's really pretty much King Tigers gun. It actually has slightly better RoF and extra 2 penetration over King Tiger at cost of accuracy and aiming speed.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux Czech Republic Show Events

  25. Post #2105
    I tried to pay a prostitute for a hug, but she turned me down because I'm a huge faggot.
    kirederf7's Avatar
    July 2010
    2,919 Posts
    New logo up already?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Belgium Show Events

  26. Post #2106
    2014 SH Pun Award Nominee
    Awesomecaek's Avatar
    January 2009
    21,175 Posts
    I think Cloak Raider doesn't want to pay the gold for it again.

    Edited:

    I need to deicide. Tomorrow my day of prem will still be running and I am grinding loadsa dosh in my KV-5. What should I buy afterwards? Rebuy my elited Patton or T28 for which i could get the 120mm through free exp, or should i grind a tad bit more and get E-100?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Czech Republic Show Events

  27. Post #2107
    Firespray's Avatar
    August 2010
    1,129 Posts
    Alright, updated the megapack. Jimbos crosshair mod, max zoom out, WoT XVM all in one. Here you go.
    http://www.mediafire.com/?mc94zin34w1csto
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Winner Winner x 3Friendly Friendly x 2Useful Useful x 2 (list)

  28. Post #2108
    Ogopogo's Avatar
    March 2011
    4,960 Posts
    Just had three 900xp defeats in my M103's. Looks like it is one of those days.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events

  29. Post #2109
    Gold Member
    Kilgore 2nd's Avatar
    June 2006
    4,139 Posts
    Just had three 900xp defeats in my M103's. Looks like it is one of those days.
    4 in my batchat, 3 games doing well and 1 kinda shitty one. All costing me lots of money, fun times.

    Merrhh, don't have as much fun in the batchat as I used to pre patch.

    Reload time is a ball-ache now. Main advantage is lost because 1 or 2 shots is wasted by a crit hit or a lucky fucking bounce. I'm at the mercy of dice rolls
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Germany Show Events

  30. Post #2110
    O'Neil's Avatar
    July 2009
    2,341 Posts
    So what the hell is the point of having destroyers in WoB, if not to detect and intercept submarines? I can understand not having aircraft carriers, but to me subs seem pretty easy to balance.
    Actually they are having Aircraft carriers, they're acting as the SPG. They'll launch A.I aircraft to the intended target and bomb it. Well, at least we can shoot down the A.I aircraft so its going to be a lot less painful then SPG and isn't instant (Due to travel time).
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Australia Show Events Informative Informative x 1 (list)

  31. Post #2111
    Captain Armed Dildo, Master of Ratings
    cpt.armadillo's Avatar
    February 2011
    5,508 Posts
    How do we control all the turrets? And I wonder if shooting down planes is player controlled.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events

  32. Post #2112
    Gold Member
    Raidyr's Avatar
    February 2007
    23,696 Posts
    I imagine it would be like how Battlestations Pacific handles ships. It behaves as a fairly typical third person shooter but you need to keep your ship turned to fire all weapons, and you can switch to flak yourself.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events Informative Informative x 1 (list)

  33. Post #2113
    O'Neil's Avatar
    July 2009
    2,341 Posts
    I think they would have it player controlled otherwise it would be too hard playing Aircraft carrier.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Australia Show Events

  34. Post #2114
    Gold Member
    mastfire's Avatar
    July 2008
    1,903 Posts
    I imagine it would be like how Battlestations Pacific handles ships. It behaves as a fairly typical third person shooter but you need to keep your ship turned to fire all weapons, and you can switch to flak yourself.
    more or less a retard friendly version of navyfield
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  35. Post #2115
    Gold Member
    fishyfish777's Avatar
    November 2007
    6,136 Posts
    WoB would be good if they made it even 1/10 as good as something like Warship Gunner 2's customization and arcade gameplay but it likely won't be
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  36. Post #2116
    Gold Member
    Eli45's Avatar
    November 2010
    674 Posts





    I think I fucked up the camera guys. That was the farthest I could zoom out
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  37. Post #2117
    Gold Member
    Kilgore 2nd's Avatar
    June 2006
    4,139 Posts
    Got to love losing a game, even when you outnumber the enemy because 2 tanks try driving across the path of a T95 one after the other and then an AMX 50 100 camps on a hill trying to shoot his front armour instead of easily flanking behind it.

    Then being the last tank left, instead of flying around the corner to get behind the T95, he backs away and hides behind a rock, finally sticking out 50% of his side armour to get insta killed.

    Fucking retards.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Germany Show Events

  38. Post #2118
    Don't drunk i'm shoot!
    Sir Spicy Buns's Avatar
    August 2010
    2,649 Posts
    Just bought my is-3, pretty happy right now. What do i get first?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  39. Post #2119
    Gold Member
    NuclearDwarf's Avatar
    January 2006
    4,784 Posts
    Just bought my is-3, pretty happy right now. What do i get first?
    BL-9
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Norway Show Events

  40. Post #2120
    Don't drunk i'm shoot!
    Sir Spicy Buns's Avatar
    August 2010
    2,649 Posts
    Can i mount that without tracks? because i already have 9k exp on the tank
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)