[Dori]

welcome to the internet where males can never be raped and females can never be rapists (as long as they're at least 8/10!!)

[Raizo]

Lucky little shit.

[archangel125]

parket posted:

you honestly think that a 16 year old boy is fit to know what he wants his cock in - what fucking planet are you on, the boy was clearly taken advantage of

No, I didn't say he wasn't exploited. I said I'm sure it wasn't rape. She didn't tie him down, she didn't drug him, and she's willowy as hell. A sixteen-year-old would've had the strength to overpower her if he wanted to. And the article doesn't make it sound like it was one incident, it seems to have happened a number of times. I think he was a very willing participant, and so it does not satisfy the legal definition of sexual assault. Statutory rape, perhaps. But no more.

[dass]

Ms. Wilson...

Thats sort of a weird name to remember

[archangel125]

What she IS guilty of is exploitation of a minor, breach of trust, and having relations with a minor over whom she held a position of authority.

[Dori]

archangel125 posted:

What she IS guilty of is exploitation of a minor, breach of trust, and having relations with a minor over whom she held a position of authority.

so basically what you're saying is it's rape

thanks for clearing that up bud

[Melkor]

archangel125 posted:

No, I didn't say he wasn't exploited. I said I'm sure it wasn't rape. She didn't tie him down, she didn't drug him, and she's willowy as hell. A sixteen-year-old would've had the strength to overpower her if he wanted to. And the article doesn't make it sound like it was one incident, it seems to have happened a number of times. I think he was a very willing participant, and so it does not satisfy the legal definition of sexual assault. Statutory rape, perhaps. But no more.

Statutory rape is still rape.

[archangel125]

Melkor posted:

Statutory rape is still rape.

I'm talking about rape as sexual assault in this case, Morgoth.

[Kendra]

Stacie Miller of the Kissimmee Police Department told Fox: 'She was having sex with one of her students when she was working. She definitely took advantage of this child.'

He's 16, how is he being taken advantage of?

[Dori]

Kendra posted:

Stacie Miller of the Kissimmee Police Department told Fox: 'She was having sex with one of her students when she was working. She definitely took advantage of this child.'

He's 16, how is he being taken advantage of?

idk maybe if you read the fucking article or this thread you would get an inkling

[Carne]

Sanius posted:

idk maybe if you read the fucking article or this thread you would get an inkling

He's 16 years old and could easily have stopped it.

[Gustafa]

There was a few teachers in my school I would have fucked when I was 16...sure she shouldn't do it with a student while she was working but people are making this out to be so much worse than it really is.

[Ericson666]

Gustafa posted:

There was a few teachers in my school I would have fucked when I was 16...sure she shouldn't do it with a student while she was working but people are making this out to be so much worse than it really is.

No, no we really aren't.

[Last or First]

archangel125 posted:

No, I didn't say he wasn't exploited. I said I'm sure it wasn't rape. She didn't tie him down, she didn't drug him, and she's willowy as hell. A sixteen-year-old would've had the strength to overpower her if he wanted to. And the article doesn't make it sound like it was one incident, it seems to have happened a number of times. I think he was a very willing participant, and so it does not satisfy the legal definition of sexual assault. Statutory rape, perhaps. But no more.

"she didn't tie him down, therefore it isn't rape"
Statutory rape is still rape.
Also, there doesn't need to be physical force for it to be rape. There can be fear of force, or fear of other repercussions for resisting. And he didn't report it at first because hey, guess what, rape is shameful, especially if it's a guy that's raped, because then everyone's all "ooh it's not rape I would hit that he must be a weak little fag or something".

archangel125 posted:

What she IS guilty of is exploitation of a minor, breach of trust, and having relations with a minor over whom she held a position of authority.

So, she's guilty of... rape... rape... and rape.
Oh yeah, definitely not rape. Even though all three of those are rape.

Kabstrac posted:

But, if he didn't want to at the time, why isn't this rape? Or am I just dumb?

Kacy Christine Wilson, 28, faces charges of unlawful sexual activity with certain minors

Aka, faces charges of
guess what
rape

I want that SA :tvtropes: emote over here.

And you fuckers do know that the South Park "...nice" thing is satire, right, not supposed to be taken seriously because saying it seriously means you're a horrible person?
You do know that, right?

[Gustafa]

Ericson666 posted:

No, no we really aren't.

I didn't mean us.

[carcarcargo]

Carne posted:

He's 16 years old and could easily have stopped it.

Yeah because all guys are big and muscly with all women being skinny and weak.

Of course whether or not he physically could have stopped it or not is irrelevant, she abused a position of trust to get with a student, who is now regretting it.

[Van-man]

archangel125 posted:

I'm talking about rape as sexual assault in this case, Morgoth.

Well rape is more than that.
But yeah, that's how pretty much everyone sees it.

[geogzm]

neat

[Dori]

hey guys I created a helpful diagram regarding rape

male authority figure taking advantage of underage children > rape
unattractive female authority figure taking advantage of underage children > rape
attractive female authority figure taking advantage of underage children > totally rad!!

[Carne]

carcarcargo posted:

Yeah because all guys are big and muscly with all women being skinny and weak.

Where did I say this?

He could have yelled out or done something. She wasn't being violent based on the article.

[Bledrix]

WHAT a faggot for complaining! You gotta take what you can get nowadays and that's not bad.

[Dori]

Bledrix posted:

WHAT a faggot for complaining! You gotta take what you can get nowadays and that's not bad.

I don't know you enough to be able to tell if you're trolling or not

please be trolling

[Funky Pickle]

Wow, this thread is a disaster.

[Last or First]

Bledrix posted:

WHAT a faggot for complaining! You gotta take what you can get nowadays and that's not bad.

Yes, yes, you would fuck a sheep at the first chance, and you jizz yourself watching little girls at the playground, we get it.
Not every guy is as desperate for sex as you, though.

OnDemand posted:

I think the 16 y/o didn't mind the sex but since the end of the school year is near and slacked way too much knew he was going to fail most his exams and took advantage of the situation. Thus getting laid and passing the year ,like a bosss.

[Kabstrac]

Last or First posted:

"she didn't tie him down, therefore it isn't rape"
Statutory rape is still rape.
Also, there doesn't need to be physical force for it to be rape. There can be fear of force, or fear of other repercussions for resisting. And he didn't report it at first because hey, guess what, rape is shameful, especially if it's a guy that's raped, because then everyone's all "ooh it's not rape I would hit that he must be a weak little fag or something".

So, she's guilty of... rape... rape... and rape.
Oh yeah, definitely not rape. Even though all three of those are rape.



Aka, faces charges of
guess what
rape

I want that SA :tvtropes: emote over here.

And you fuckers do know that the South Park "...nice" thing is satire, right, not supposed to be taken seriously because saying it seriously means you're a horrible person?
You do know that, right?

Okay, I just didn't know that "unlawful sexual activity with certain minors" is another way of saying statutory rape. Although in hindsight, I don't know what else it could be.

[OnDemand]

It is difficult to have sex with a woman if you don't want to and haven't been harassed or blackmailed by her in some way.

[xxncxx]

I thought this thread was about the news story, not about people complaining about jokes

[Dori]

xxncxx posted:

I thought this thread was about the news story, not about people complaining about jokes

what thread are you reading

[xxncxx]

Sanius posted:

what thread are you reading

Could be any thread that you post in because that's basically what happens.

Edited:

I'm not gonna discuss this and further derail the thread.

[Itachi_Crow]

xxncxx posted:

I thought this thread was about the news story, not about people complaining about jokes

jokes about rape aren't funny

Edited:

oh

[Hyzo]

I personally wouldn't have minded, but clearly he did... and even thought he should have been able to say no it's not uncommon for rape victims to be too shocked to say anything.

My guess would have to be that he was too horny to refuse and afterwards was ashamed, which would still put the teacher responsible even though she only seduced him(But all rape isn't violent so I guess it could still be classified as rape).

[Itachi_Crow]

ohhhhhh

[Lemonator]

Sanius posted:

hey guys I created a helpful diagram regarding rape

male authority figure taking advantage of underage children > rape
unattractive female authority figure taking advantage of underage children > rape
attractive female authority figure taking advantage of underage children > totally rad!!

This is true though admit it

When the victim is 16

[The Baconator]

Lordgeorge16 posted:

I'm surprised that there aren't a multitude of "Why the fuck would you give that up? She's hot!" posts. I was expecting one every other post, but for once, people are more concerned about the victim.

What a twist, Facepunch.

facepunch is a hivemind, let's blame all of facepunch for a few users posts

[Dori]

Lemonator posted:

This is true though admit it

When the victim is 16

no

[Mr. Smartass]

If the genders were reversed, everyone would be calling the teacher a monster.

[Itachi_Crow]

Lemonator posted:

This is true though admit it

When the victim is 16

how does his age have anything to do with it

unwanted, non-consensual sex = rape

its pretty cut and dry

if he'd wanted it he'd obviously NOT go to the authorities over it to rat her out

[Dori]

Mr. Smartass posted:

If the genders were reversed, everyone would be calling the teacher a monster.

everyone is

[Wormy]

Mr. Smartass posted:

If the genders were reversed, everyone would be calling the teacher a monster.

Well, do you feel surprised?

[Itachi_Crow]

Mr. Smartass posted:

If the genders were reversed, everyone would be calling the teacher a monster.

they would but that's because dumb nerdy desperate retards on the internet can't comprehend why someone wouldn't want to have sex with an attractive woman