Each person who played Bond took a different direction. People struggle to accept differences and can't get over it.
Ian Fleming only managed to see Dr No, and he hated it. It's clear he thought Connery was a vast mis-interpretation.
Therefore there is no "right" Bond here. That being said, Dan is the man.
Pierce was pretty much himself in his movies, watch The Thomas Crown Affair if you don't believe me.
I don't get how people don't understand the theme of the reboot anyway.
In casino royale (which was very well made), he's a rookie 00, recruited straight out of the SAS. The whole point of that film is to see bond before he finds his groove, he's rough around the edges, brash, arrogant and gets emotionally attached to the situation. He fucks up several times throughout the film badly. The Vesper character was pivotal in this because it's her betrayal and death that shapes what he becomes.
Quantum of Solace (yes it's a shit movie, there is no argument there, but keep in mind it was made during the writers strike, it was the director and craig literally attempting to write things as they went along) takes place directly after CR. I just like to pretend this film doesn't exist.
1 hit, 1 miss. I'd say wait until Skyfall comes out before you start deriding this reboot.
Spot on, Bond is played pretty differently from version to version.
I think that Craig is the best Bond so far, but that is probably because I much prefer the dark and gritty style of his Bond.