1. Post #41
    Gold Member
    sp00ks's Avatar
    January 2008
    11,547 Posts
    The New Testament says nothing about homosexuality.
    Not allowing homosexuals to get married is discrimination, no matter what the church believes about homosexuality.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Disagree Disagree x 4 (list)

  2. Post #42
    Gold Member
    Crimor's Avatar
    June 2008
    7,846 Posts
    And lutherans have always been pretty bro about gay people from what I've seen, at least the danish ones.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  3. Post #43
    Gold Member
    RearAdmiral's Avatar
    May 2010
    5,094 Posts
    Denmark? More like Menmark.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events Funny x 6Dumb x 3Zing x 2Agree x 1Disagree x 1 (list)

  4. Post #44
    Gold Member
    Furioso's Avatar
    October 2006
    3,666 Posts
    I really hate this whole discussion, because in my opinion, there shouldn't be one. I'm for gay marriage, but I'm not for gay marriage in the sense that they should be able to get married in a church, and it's not because I'm old fashion or overly christian. However, it just doesn't make any logical sense to me WHY gay people would want to get married in a church? It's a _CHRISTIAN_ institution who has an issue with man-on-man action. Why would you want to be married into a belief where you aren't welcome? And WHY is it their right to be so? They aren't welcomed by the faith itself. I don't care how many priests see it, because frankly, the bible literally state that being gay is, not a sin, but simply wrong and disgusting. It's not even something you can interpret as you want; look it up. It literally says so in the bible and seeing as the bible is basically the rulebook of christianity, it doesn't make any sense why they'd even want to get married. It's not a right they have, not when it comes to christianity.
    it's because weddings have lost most religious connotations - well, to most people, anyway. most kids are brought up with the idea that one day, they'll stand in a chapel during some grand ceremony with their soon-to-be spouse and become newlyweds, and that includes kids who end up becoming gay adults... that desire and mentality sticks, so it kinda sucks that they get denied the opportunity

    I mean, I get what you're saying, but compare it to something like Christmas. a lot of people celebrate it, but most people don't really celebrate it in a religious sense, even though it's supposed to be a celebration of Jesus Christ's birth.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  5. Post #45
    Gold Member
    Crimor's Avatar
    June 2008
    7,846 Posts
    Denmark? More like Menmark.
    That was horrible and you should feel horrible
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Agree Agree x 8 (list)

  6. Post #46
    Gold Member
    RearAdmiral's Avatar
    May 2010
    5,094 Posts
    That was horrible and you should feel horrible
    I do. It's not even a real joke.

    Still, congrats Denmark. I should imagine there's a lot of gay honeymoons on the horizon.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events Friendly Friendly x 1Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  7. Post #47
    I LOVE IT WHEN SANIUS HAS HIS ROCK HARD TWO INCH COCK UP MY TIGHT LITTLE ASS.
    Ownederd's Avatar
    August 2006
    3,568 Posts
    gay marriage was legal in Maine until a referendum came about

    fuck

    :(
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Friendly Friendly x 5Agree Agree x 1Dumb Dumb x 1Winner Winner x 1 (list)

  8. Post #48
    Foxgurl maid
    Luafox's Avatar
    January 2008
    14,275 Posts
    I mean, I get what you're saying, but compare it to something like Christmas. a lot of people celebrate it, but most people don't really celebrate it in a religious sense, even though it's supposed to be a celebration of Jesus Christ's birth.
    its not supposed to be to anyone who's not christian, its not even a christian holiday to begin with


    but anyway, i thought denmark had done this long ago seeing how its a scandinavian country, but good that they did it at last.

  9. Post #49
    Gold Member
    Crimor's Avatar
    June 2008
    7,846 Posts
    its not supposed to be to anyone who's not christian, its not even a christian holiday to begin with


    but anyway, i thought denmark had done this long ago seeing how its a scandinavian country, but good that they did it at last.
    We technically had, like we could get married, but not in a church.

  10. Post #50
    Gold Member
    GoDong-DK's Avatar
    November 2009
    12,521 Posts
    its not supposed to be to anyone who's not christian, its not even a christian holiday to begin with


    but anyway, i thought denmark had done this long ago seeing how its a scandinavian country, but good that they did it at last.
    As far as I remember we were the first to make legal gay marriage possible, we were just a bit slow on this one.

  11. Post #51
    Gold Member
    killer89's Avatar
    November 2006
    1,072 Posts
    I really hate this whole discussion, because in my opinion, there shouldn't be one. I'm for gay marriage, but I'm not for gay marriage in the sense that they should be able to get married in a church, and it's not because I'm old fashion or overly christian. However, it just doesn't make any logical sense to me WHY gay people would want to get married in a church? It's a _CHRISTIAN_ institution who has an issue with man-on-man action. Why would you want to be married into a belief where you aren't welcome? And WHY is it their right to be so? They aren't welcomed by the faith itself. I don't care how many priests see it, because frankly, the bible literally state that being gay is, not a sin, but simply wrong and disgusting. It's not even something you can interpret as you want; look it up. It literally says so in the bible and seeing as the bible is basically the rulebook of christianity, it doesn't make any sense why they'd even want to get married. It's not a right they have, not when it comes to christianity.
    Gays started to spread the AIDS, so i somewhat understand on why some people hate them to death.
    (it was originally gay - disease, till it expanded to straight people.)
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Finland Show Events Dumb Dumb x 8Funny Funny x 2Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  12. Post #52
    Gays started to spread the AIDS, so i somewhat understand on why some people hate them to death.
    (it was originally gay - disease, till it expanded to straight people.)
    Umm no it wasn't. Gays were used as a scapegoat.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Latvia Show Events Agree Agree x 10Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)

  13. Post #53
    Turbo Dyke
    FlubberNugget's Avatar
    June 2010
    11,836 Posts
    Gays started to spread the AIDS, so i somewhat understand on why some people hate them to death.
    (it was originally gay - disease, till it expanded to straight people.)
    how can you be this uninformed
    It was more rampant in the gay community than the straight, but it wasn't limited to gay people ever.

  14. Post #54
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,620 Posts
    I wrote a long-ass post in Danish on facebook explaining why the current church-system we have is best for us. I'll just quote it, but for non-danes, all it amounts up to is that if it's changed, we risk going all badshit towards a muslim-like state, where church controls state OR we go the american way and everyone just gets seriously focused and sensationalistic about all of the things that matter shit-all. I also clarify that out national church isn't much more than a state-driven ceremonial institution and by virtue of being state-driven, can't discriminate people for things they can't help being.


       
    Person: "Så er det vidst tid at melde sig ud af kirken"
    Mig: Det er også fint at få gjort. Om man er for eller imod kan man ikke ændre på at Folkekirken er statsdrevet og at staten ikke må diskriminere på basis af køn. Folkekirken er ikke en kirke, men en ceremoniel service til folket i et land hvor kristendom ikke er meget mere end mærkedage for de fleste. Jeg er enig i deres beslutning på grund af dette og jeg er enig i at alle der er imod bør melde sig ud hvis de ønsker det og tilslutte sig en kirke der giver dem den service som de ønsker. Hvis den service er at diskriminere på basis af bibelske tekster, rettere end at være konstruktiv. så fred være med det. Så længe det ikke er obligatorisk fra statens side.

    Det er faktisk generelt træls at se hvor mange der gør indsigelser i hvordan andre folk lever deres liv. Man kan så sige at det er meget heldigt at disse indsigelser ikke rækker ind til hvad der foregår i hjemmet her til lands, men for vidt går de stadig når de skal styre andre folks gøren og laden i kirken. Hvis et træ vælter i skoven, får man så ondt af det? Njøh. Dine børn bliver jo ikke homoseksualiserede af at andre gør det og det er sådan set mere en sag imellem gud og individet end det er en sag imellem dig og individet eller kirken og individet. Min vinkel er egentlig bare at kirken har åbnet endnu en port for mennesker til at gå frem til deres endelige dom foran gud og det kan jeg ikke se er skadeligt medmindre ens frygt er mere jordisk... F.eks. bevarelse af traditioner eller kontrol over andres vilje.

    Min grundlæggende tanke er egentlig at en stats-drevet kirke er en elendig idé når det kommer til tro da det eneste den gør er at kvæle alle andre trosretninger en protestanter. Det negative ved at fjerne den er så at vi pludselig sidder med et system meget lig det amerikanske... Vi kommer til at have galskab på lige fod med WBC og Jehova på meget bredere plan. Jeg ved ikke helt hvad jeg helst vil have, for i sidste ende kan begge føre til at gamle hoveder kommer til at styre meget mere i mit liv end de burde, uafhængig af hvad din egen intention kunne være. 
      
    Really. Religion really means near to nothing to us as a nation. The only reason there is so much animosity towards Muslims specifically is due to a narrowminded fear that they'll start infiltrating our government and start passing laws in accordance to Sharia or whatever. Just watch any real-film produced here since 1998 or any of the animated films of late and you should work out that we're far from squeamish and polite enough to have any kind of socially enforced religion.

  15. Post #55
    "I'm better than you cuz I got 100 dumbs in 1 post
    DDmaster's Avatar
    February 2009
    345 Posts
    Christian longballs
    In Danish it's longass.. "Christian longass"

  16. Post #56
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,620 Posts
    It's been an over-blown public discussion and we're not used to having irrelevant religious discussions on a national level. Never had one before. We're more concerned with important subjects, like social prosperity, educational issues, health concerns, free speech (big thing since the Muhammed shitstorm). With all of those subjects comes responsibility to keep the discussion within sensibility, so they take a wildly different direction than in Britain or America where one descends into fist fighting and the other into an incoherrent screaming competition.

    Edited:

    In Danish it's longass.. "Christian longass"
    Aldrig hørt om Lange Løg?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Mac Denmark Show Events Zing Zing x 1 (list)

  17. Post #57
    Gold Member
    sp00ks's Avatar
    January 2008
    11,547 Posts
    Gays started to spread the AIDS, so i somewhat understand on why some people hate them to death.
    (it was originally gay - disease, till it expanded to straight people.)
    straight people started every other disease...

    Edited:

    Hvis den service er at diskriminere på basis af bibelske tekster, rettere end at være konstruktiv. så fred være med det. Så længe det ikke er obligatorisk fra statens side.
    High school education is obligatory either, but imagine if they discriminated against homosexuals.

  18. Post #58
    Gold Member
    killer89's Avatar
    November 2006
    1,072 Posts
    straight people started every other disease...

    Edited:




    High school education is obligatory either, but imagine if they discriminated against homosexuals.
    AIDS being one of the few, which still doesnt have a cure.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Finland Show Events Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)

  19. Post #59
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,620 Posts

    High school education is obligatory either, but imagine if they discriminated against homosexuals.
    Isn't* and who discriminated against Homosexuals? Education is to be legally available to all who qualify, since it's managed by state. The minimal requirement for High-School/College is 9th Grade exams passed. Minimal requirements for University is Passed College. The reason for these requirements are more about qualification than discrimination.
    If they banned Homosexuals, Denmark would implode. It's not in our DNA to restrict anyone by law. We just cuss them out and abuse them verbally in a jokey manner. Leave it to Republicans and the Middle-East to talk about legal preferences to a certain social group.
    We were the first country with Legalized porn. We don't give a shit about restricting much of anything ever. Except for a few minor hickups possibly.

    Point still stands. services provided by the state has to treat each national equally to the others or at least with a common minimum denominator that is acceptable.

    Edited:

    Hvorfor føler jeg for at finde nogle gamle Mogens Glistrup klip frem? Når ja, det er fordi han er så skudt i hovedet som denne debat har været.

  20. Post #60
    Gold Member
    sp00ks's Avatar
    January 2008
    11,547 Posts
    Not allowing homosexuals to get married in a state run church is discrimination.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Agree Agree x 7Dumb Dumb x 1Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  21. Post #61
    Jeep-Eep's Avatar
    June 2010
    3,071 Posts
    It would appear that gonedead0 is a butthurt homophobe. Mind posting so that we may laugh at your expense?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP Canada Show Events Artistic Artistic x 1 (list)

  22. Post #62
    Gold Member
    Splarg!'s Avatar
    September 2005
    2,068 Posts
    I really hate this whole discussion, because in my opinion, there shouldn't be one. I'm for gay marriage, but I'm not for gay marriage in the sense that they should be able to get married in a church, and it's not because I'm old fashion or overly christian. However, it just doesn't make any logical sense to me WHY gay people would want to get married in a church? It's a _CHRISTIAN_ institution who has an issue with man-on-man action. Why would you want to be married into a belief where you aren't welcome? And WHY is it their right to be so? They aren't welcomed by the faith itself. I don't care how many priests see it, because frankly, the bible literally state that being gay is, not a sin, but simply wrong and disgusting. It's not even something you can interpret as you want; look it up. It literally says so in the bible and seeing as the bible is basically the rulebook of christianity, it doesn't make any sense why they'd even want to get married. It's not a right they have, not when it comes to christianity.
    it's because weddings have lost most religious connotations - well, to most people, anyway. most kids are brought up with the idea that one day, they'll stand in a chapel during some grand ceremony with their soon-to-be spouse and become newlyweds, and that includes kids who end up becoming gay adults... that desire and mentality sticks, so it kinda sucks that they get denied the opportunity.
    Exactly, you're saying to a whole bunch of people (some of which are steady churchgoers) "why would you want to be a part of something that hates you so much?" (which is an incredibly un-Christian message from the church by the way). The idea that Gays should just be like "yeah, screw Christianity, we don't even want to get married anymore" is absurd, because guess what, Christians aren't the only ones who get married...EVERYBODY grows up expecting to get married and you're just shoving Gays into the corner and saying "hey guys, you're not allowed to do this one thing that everyone else does, but you'll get over it."

    And anybody who acts like gay marriage infringes their religious rights can go fuck themselves with a tire iron. The same exact shit was used to try and block interracial marriage, but you don't see social conservatives talking about that anymore, do you?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 3 (list)

  23. Post #63
    C47
    C47's Avatar
    January 2010
    892 Posts

    Picture of who voted for, against and neither.
    Thats pretty cool, the screen. imagine having a live feed on scale of a country :O

    Not allowing homosexuals to get married in a state run church is discrimination.
    thats stupid. like saying allowing a crime to happen in a police station is stupid. or enforcing law in a criminal hideout is stupid (i put both sides so not to pick on the sensitive anti/pro christrian fp crowd).

    christians dont like homosexuals. must you annoy them and ask for marriages in their churches? abiding by religion should be the least of their concerns if they are "doomed to hell" because of their orientation.

    just go to the state run court which accepts them
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP United Arab Emirates Show Events Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)

  24. Post #64
    Gold Member
    SaWAH's Avatar
    January 2008
    1,272 Posts
    Exactly, you're saying to a whole bunch of people (some of which are steady churchgoers) "why would you want to be a part of something that hates you so much?" (which is an incredibly un-Christian message from the church by the way). The idea that Gays should just be like "yeah, screw Christianity, we don't even want to get married anymore" is absurd, because guess what, Christians aren't the only ones who get married...EVERYBODY grows up expecting to get married and you're just shoving Gays into the corner and saying "hey guys, you're not allowed to do this one thing that everyone else does, but you'll get over it."

    And anybody who acts like gay marriage infringes their religious rights can go fuck themselves with a tire iron. The same exact shit was used to try and block interracial marriage, but you don't see social conservatives talking about that anymore, do you?
    Big difference there, though, between interracial marriage and gay marriage: the bible doesn't say anything about that. What you need to understand is that getting married ISN'T a Christian thing anymore, which is why there's an alternative. You can go down to city hall, get the official ceremoni done and have a big fancy wedding. What most people are so keen to have isn't a church wedding as such, it's just all the other stuff. They want fancy clothes, fancy food, a big party and so on, which is fully possibly even if you don't get married in a church.

    I don't really give a fuck about whether or not they're able to get married in a church, I mean, if that's how it is, fine by me, but it's the whole discussion and the fact that Folkepartiet has decided that every priest, even those who do not wish to do so, have to wed gay people. I think it should be individual from priest to priest.

  25. Post #65
    Gold Member
    GoDong-DK's Avatar
    November 2009
    12,521 Posts
    Big difference there, though, between interracial marriage and gay marriage: the bible doesn't say anything about that. What you need to understand is that getting married ISN'T a Christian thing anymore, which is why there's an alternative. You can go down to city hall, get the official ceremoni done and have a big fancy wedding. What most people are so keen to have isn't a church wedding as such, it's just all the other stuff. They want fancy clothes, fancy food, a big party and so on, which is fully possibly even if you don't get married in a church.

    I don't really give a fuck about whether or not they're able to get married in a church, I mean, if that's how it is, fine by me, but it's the whole discussion and the fact that Folkepartiet has decided that every priest, even those who do not wish to do so, have to wed gay people. I think it should be individual from priest to priest.
    From the article:
    Article posted:
    It remains up to each priest, whether he will marry homosexuals.

  26. Post #66
    Gold Member
    Crimor's Avatar
    June 2008
    7,846 Posts
    What some of the people here probably don't understand is that lutheran(The state religion) priests actually don't mind this, they're all for it.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  27. Post #67
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,620 Posts
    What some of the people here probably don't understand is that lutheran(The state religion) priests actually don't mind this, they're all for it.
    That's just ONE of the awesome things that happen when you have priests that don't believe the bullshit they spout. Even an atheist priest is the best priest. Food for thought.

  28. Post #68
    Gold Member
    Crimor's Avatar
    June 2008
    7,846 Posts
    It's mainly due to lutheran christianity being nothing like the fire and brimstone american ones. From what I remember it's pretty much "don't be a dick mmk"

  29. Post #69
    Gold Member
    GoDong-DK's Avatar
    November 2009
    12,521 Posts
    That's just ONE of the awesome things that happen when you have priests that don't believe the bullshit they spout. Even an atheist priest is the best priest. Food for thought.
    This post makes no sense. I'm pretty sure that most priests believe the "bullshit" they spout (and in the case of Danish priests I'd argue that they're pretty damn reasonable), but the Danish priests have just cut back on the bullshit.
    I'm an atheist, but I have been to a christian camp a few times (without this being some funky extreme camp with "love Jesus" night and day, or even much focus on it at all), and the priest there is probably one of the people I've met that had most knowledge of life. He didn't preach the bible much or anything, he told stories of his childhood, adolescence and when he was a young man, and he just told us what he had learned from them. This has nothing to do with gay marriage, but many priests are very fien people. That's all I'm saying.

    Edited:

    It's mainly due to lutheran christianity being nothing like the fire and brimstone american ones. From what I remember it's pretty much "don't be a dick mmk"
    Luther was a dick himself, no question about that. Extremely conservative and he justified the killings of a lot of peasants. He just had some different views on the church and christianity.

  30. Post #70
    Gold Member
    Crimor's Avatar
    June 2008
    7,846 Posts
    Yeah not arguing about luther being a dick or not, he totally was, but modern lutheran christianity seems pretty bro. And that priest you were talking about sounds pretty much like every lutheran priest I've ever met (I'm atheist myself, but I like discussing religion and other things with priests since it's always nice to get a second opinion)

  31. Post #71
    Pierrewithahat's Avatar
    December 2011
    5,623 Posts
    AIDS being one of the few, which still doesnt have a cure.
    Actually there are treatments for it now that can essentially stop the HIV virus, and we do have a cure for AIDS just now but it requires a fully body blood transplant which is inherently retardedly dangerous.

    But again there's other treatments.

  32. Post #72

    August 2007
    318 Posts
    Are the black dots people who aren't there?
    If so, you have the same problem as Sweden.

  33. Post #73
    Gold Member
    GoDong-DK's Avatar
    November 2009
    12,521 Posts
    Are the black dots people who aren't there?
    If so, you have the same problem as Sweden.
    Yep, and I wouldn't call it a problem.

  34. Post #74
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,620 Posts
    This post makes no sense. I'm pretty sure that most priests believe the "bullshit" they spout (and in the case of Danish priests I'd argue that they're pretty damn reasonable), but the Danish priests have just cut back on the bullshit.
    I'm an atheist, but I have been to a christian camp a few times (without this being some funky extreme camp with "love Jesus" night and day, or even much focus on it at all), and the priest there is probably one of the people I've met that had most knowledge of life. He didn't preach the bible much or anything, he told stories of his childhood, adolescence and when he was a young man, and he just told us what he had learned from them. This has nothing to do with gay marriage, but many priests are very fien people. That's all I'm saying.
    Which proves my point. You don't go though 8 years of studies in every mythology without working out how bullshit the religion of Christianity is and how hard it's plagiarised. What priests believe in is the Philosophical message and that's what they preach. I've been in both the average danish camp and the mad-hatter nutcase camp and i'll tell you... that has zero relevance at all!

    What it is, is that we've got a church that is largely ceremonial and that's it. We have priests who have got too large a perspective on mythologies to believe one that is so obviously plagiarised and flawed. They only preach the philosophy because there's no way in all nine hells that you Finnish the Theology class as a religious man. In fact, most who start there as believers get majorly butthurt and leave because the course treats it as a mythology and puts it on the same level as other religions and mythologies.

    It's almost more philosophical than philosophy class, because in Philosophy class, you get to cover some big names like Socrates, Nietzsche and whatever, but Theology covers local philosophy... What the average Joe thought or was taught to think. Now THAT is high-level analysis right there. What made the vikings tick? What made ancient Persia tick? What was the world view? That's a major part of the course. That and analysing scriptures from all corners of the earth and all ages.

    There's a reason that it's an 8 year education.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  35. Post #75
    Gold Member
    Bonde's Avatar
    December 2006
    1,278 Posts
    Religion has now learned not to fuck with the danish state :V


    BTW: For the people who still aren't getting it: Gays have been allowed to "marry" here for a long time, now they can also get married in a church.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  36. Post #76
    Gold Member
    GoDong-DK's Avatar
    November 2009
    12,521 Posts
    Which proves my point. You don't go though 8 years of studies in every mythology without working out how bullshit the religion of Christianity is and how hard it's plagiarised. What priests believe in is the Philosophical message and that's what they preach. I've been in both the average danish camp and the mad-hatter nutcase camp and i'll tell you... that has zero relevance at all!

    What it is, is that we've got a church that is largely ceremonial and that's it. We have priests who have got too large a perspective on mythologies to believe one that is so obviously plagiarised and flawed. They only preach the philosophy because there's no way in all nine hells that you Finnish the Theology class as a religious man. In fact, most who start there as believers get majorly butthurt and leave because the course treats it as a mythology and puts it on the same level as other religions and mythologies.

    It's almost more philosophical than philosophy class, because in Philosophy class, you get to cover some big names like Socrates, Nietzsche and whatever, but Theology covers local philosophy... What the average Joe thought or was taught to think. Now THAT is high-level analysis right there. What made the vikings tick? What made ancient Persia tick? What was the world view? That's a major part of the course. That and analysing scriptures from all corners of the earth and all ages.

    There's a reason that it's an 8 year education.
    Let me quote your first post:

    That's just ONE of the awesome things that happen when you have priests that don't believe the bullshit they spout. Even an atheist priest is the best priest. Food for thought.
    Now let me quote some of your post:
    What priests believe in is the Philosophical message and that's what they preach.
    If you combine the very clear meanings of these statements, you're saying that priests spout "philosophical bullshit" and they don't believe what they're spouting, even though they believe in it. I'm not saying that what you're saying is wrong, but the post I replied to is radically different from the post you posted just now, and therefore I think it's safe to say that the new argument has zero relevance to the former.

    Anyhow, what are they supposed to believe in? Everything the Bible says? No church or priest has ever preached every word of the Bible as the final truth, and the catholic church actually made some substantial changes to it in their translation to latin (like including the church and so on), so why is it so bad that some priests are now distancing themselves from parts of the Bible? That's what we've been doing all along. So I'm going to go ahead and say that whatever "bullshit" a priest may be spouting, whether purely philosophical or biblical, it is highly probable that it's a subjective and personal choice, and that they believe it themselves.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Denmark Show Events Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)

  37. Post #77
    BloodRayne's Avatar
    December 2009
    406 Posts
    This is wrong. Gay couples getting married in a church.. It goes against christanity as homosexuality is a sin under god.

    I don't care about them getting married only that it not be in a church\holy place.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Germany Show Events Dumb Dumb x 6Funny Funny x 2Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  38. Post #78
    Antdawg's Avatar
    July 2010
    2,931 Posts
    Only thing wrong I see with this vote were the representatives (who I assume) chose not to vote or weren't their to vote. Doesn't feel right to me when you have only half of the elected members of parliament voting on such an important issue.

  39. Post #79
    Chicken_Chaser's Avatar
    June 2010
    4,070 Posts
    This is wrong. Gay couples getting married in a church.. It goes against christanity as homosexuality is a sin under god.

    I don't care about them getting married only that it not be in a church\holy place.
    That's between them and God. It shouldn't matter how much you care.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 1Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  40. Post #80
    Gold Member
    GoDong-DK's Avatar
    November 2009
    12,521 Posts
    Only thing wrong I see with this vote were the representatives (who I assume) chose not to vote or weren't their to vote. Doesn't feel right to me when you have only half of the elected members of parliament voting on such an important issue.
    This is how it goes on in Denmark. If someone in the parliament feel that the vote didn't represent the whole picture, they can say so. And if they really had an opinion on this they would've just come themselves. They decided themselves not to show up for the discussion, and having all people in the parliament at the same time isn't very efficient either way.