1. Post #1
    Dennab
    April 2011
    2,635 Posts
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47814187.../#.T91KBbVSSSo

    Certain soaps used to wash babies shortly after birth may cause the baby to test positive for marijuana on some newborn screening tests, a new study suggests.

    In the study, urine samples that contained minute amounts of any of five baby soaps Johnson & Johnson's Head-to-Toe Baby Wash, J&J Bedtime
    Bath, CVS Night-Time Baby Bath, Aveeno Soothing Relief Creamy Wash and Aveeno Wash Shampoo gave a positive result on a drug screening test
    for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient in marijuana.

    The researchers began their investigation after nurses at a North Carolina hospital reported an increase in the number of newborns testing positive for
    marijuana.

    The amount of soap in the urine needed to produce a positive test result was tiny, less than 0.1 milliliters, the researchers said.

    It's important to note the soaps do not produce a "high," or any other effects of marijuana, in infants. "It's not marijuana a in any way, shape or
    form," said study researcher Catherine Hammett-Stabler, a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of North Carolina, Chapel
    Hill.

    A screening test that indicates a baby has been exposed to marijuana can lead to the involvement of social services, and accusations of child abuse,
    the researchers said.

    Given these consequences, it's important for health-care providers and laboratory staffs to be aware that these soaps may lead to a positive test for
    marijuana, and to consider confirming positive tests with a more sensitive method, the researchers said.

    "We really did this to help protect families from being falsely accused" of drug use, and to help ensure that intervention efforts are directed to babies
    who are truly at risk of drug exposure, said study researcher Dr. Carl Seashore, a pediatrician in the newborn nursery at UNC Chapel Hill.

    Drug screening tests in hospitals that come back positive are not usually sent out to laboratories for additional conformation, because of the time and
    cost involved, said study researcher Catherine Hammett-Stabler, also of UNC Chapel Hill.

    Newborn screening for exposure to marijuana is common, and is especially recommended for babies born to women considered to be "high risk" for drug
    use, such as those who do not come in for prenatal care visits, Hammett-Stabler said. At UNC Chapel Hill, 10 to 40 percent of babies born in the
    hospital receive the test each month, Seashore said.

    Why the result?

    The researchers aren't sure why the baby soaps cause the marijuana screening test to come back positive. It could be that some of the compounds in
    the soap have a structure that is partly similar to THC, or it could be that chemicals in the soap change the way the test works, Hammett-Stabler
    said.

    The test is likely showing a positive result because some residual soap on the skin is washing off into the baby's urine sample, Hammett-Stabler said.

    When a more sensitive test was used on the urine samples containing the soap, the test came back negative, she said.

    Piece of the puzzle

    One positive test for marijuana exposure would not likely be enough to get social services involved with the parents, Seashore said.

    "It would only be one piece of the puzzle," Seashore said.

    Other factors would be taken into account, such as a history of substance abuse or lack of prenatal care, Seashore said.

    The UNC Chapel Hill now sends all positive newborn drug urine tests for conformation before any action is taken.

    The study, published in the June issue of the journal Clinical Biochemistry, also highlights the importance of collaboration and communication between
    different units of a hospital, the researchers said.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Funny Funny x 35 (list)

  2. Post #2
    "You should see my penis, it puts a wookie to shame. its like a fucking front tail."
    Dysgalt's Avatar
    January 2010
    2,390 Posts
    "No officer I swear it was the shampoo"
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows Vista United States Show Events Funny Funny x 43Winner Winner x 2 (list)

  3. Post #3

    September 2007
    398 Posts
    ...
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 3 (list)

  4. Post #4
    If the mods approve of this title they hereby admit that they are all massive faggots
    koeniginator's Avatar
    October 2009
    9,617 Posts
    "officer, you've got to believe me, J&J isn't some weird slang or jargon for marijuana"
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  5. Post #5
    Jdeedler's Avatar
    April 2008
    171 Posts
    "We really did this to help protect families from being falsely accused" of drug use.
    said study researcher Dr. Carl Seashore.
    What the fuck man, I mean the intentions are fine but isn't this ridiculous?

    Test the high as fuck parents instead when they decide to have a baby.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Dumb Dumb x 32 (list)

  6. Post #6
    Gold Member
    Schmaaa's Avatar
    June 2009
    5,976 Posts
    What the fuck man, I mean the intentions are fine but isn't this ridiculous?

    Test the high as fuck parents instead when they decide to have a baby.
    Read the article. No one is high on anything, it's a soap used to wash the baby after they're born that for some reason is causing the babies to test positive for marijuana in health screenings.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 13 (list)

  7. Post #7
    Dennab
    December 2011
    5,623 Posts
    What the fuck man, I mean the intentions are fine but isn't this ridiculous?

    Test the high as fuck parents instead when they decide to have a baby.
    Did you even read the article? This is to show that some soaps can cause a positive result, and is to stop families from being falsely accused of child abuse essentially.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP Professional x64 Europe Show Events Agree Agree x 13 (list)

  8. Post #8
    Dark RaveN's Avatar
    September 2010
    3,116 Posts
    Rate me dumb, but why do people test newborn on marijuana? Or they do an overall drug test?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Estonia Show Events Dumb Dumb x 5 (list)

  9. Post #9
    Crash15's Avatar
    July 2011
    6,504 Posts
    Nevermind
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply United States Show Events Informative Informative x 1 (list)

  10. Post #10
    Don't lose your way
    Limed00d's Avatar
    February 2011
    5,350 Posts
    I thought these babies did dope ass shit and were cool, but no, it was just SOAP.
    Damn wannabes.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Norway Show Events Agree Agree x 4 (list)

  11. Post #11
    Dennab
    December 2011
    5,623 Posts
    Rate me dumb, but why do people test newborn on marijuana? Or they do an overall drug test?
    It'll be a blanket blood test they run to try and pick up any health issues the kid might have.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP Professional x64 Europe Show Events Agree Agree x 2 (list)

  12. Post #12
    Resident Raccoon
    kaze4159's Avatar
    January 2008
    8,721 Posts
    Rate me dumb, but why do people test newborn on marijuana? Or they do an overall drug test?
    It's mostly to test if they've been exposed to drugs by their parents
    Generally raising a newborn isn't something you can do stoned

    Edited:

    It'll be a blanket blood test they run to try and pick up any health issues the kid might have.
    This too
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows Vista Australia Show Events Agree Agree x 1Informative Informative x 1 (list)

  13. Post #13
    Official Bro of DD

    June 2010
    13,642 Posts
    We have bath salts and now we have bath soap.
    This is getting silly
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 New Zealand Show Events Funny Funny x 5 (list)

  14. Post #14
    Dennab
    December 2011
    5,623 Posts
    We have bath salts and now we have bath soap.
    This is getting silly
    I'VE FOUND THE COMMON DENOMINATOR, WE MUST DESTROY BATH PRODUCTS, WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP Professional x64 Europe Show Events Agree Agree x 11 (list)

  15. Post #15
    The Worm's Avatar
    December 2011
    2,208 Posts
    But there are people who live in the neighboring town of Bath, Maine, to think about!
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Linux United States Show Events Winner Winner x 3 (list)

  16. Post #16
    Naaz's Avatar
    January 2012
    1,692 Posts
    But there are people who live in the neighboring town of Bath, Maine, to think about!
    Kill them with fire.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP United States Show Events Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  17. Post #17
    Dennab
    December 2011
    5,623 Posts
    But there are people who live in the neighboring town of Bath, Maine, to think about!
    THEY'RE ENABLING THESE BATH FIENDS! ARREST THEM FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN!
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP Professional x64 Europe Show Events Funny Funny x 3 (list)