seriously, if a male official calls someone a cunt, it should be about him being a dick, not about him being a woman-hating conservative
seriously, if a male official calls someone a cunt, it should be about him being a dick, not about him being a woman-hating conservative
Nobody cares about "here"
this happened in the US. It doesn't matter what meanings and weight a word has in your country.
I am more angry because this is an inappropriate thing to say in politics rather than whether or not this is misogynous.
In the end whether or not this was meant to be misogynous is based upon what Frank Foster intended, but that does not make it any less inappropriate.
does calling somebody out for being a misogynist make you uncomfortable? maybe you should call up your /r/mensrights buddies and talk to them about it. I worry about you
I live in the fucking US dude.
When you and your co-representatives just made headlines because you silenced two female representatives for saying "vagina" and "no means no" in response to a bill severely restricting abortion (an issue affecting women, not men), people are going to notice when you call a woman a cunt and fake having a child (an autistic one at that) because you're upset that someone is mowing their lawn.
But you're still using a derogatory term for female anatomy. Of course you're not going to just walk up to a random woman and call her a cunt (well, unless if you're Frank Foster, of course), but why use a female-centric term at all, instead of a more neutral one like "asshole", "piece of shit", "fuckwad", or "sheep-fucking shit-for-brains asswipe"?
that says that it can be a derogatory term for women, whereas "nigger" is exclusively used in a discriminatory context.
not that I doubt the guy in the story was being misogynistic, but your comparison isn't really very valid.
ad hominems are popular in these parts
yeah sorry sometimes i get a little sad that i cant help but laugh and join in when my father calls my mom a cunt at least twice a day so i go online and pretend i dont
Can't really help that cunt has a pretty good way of letting you express your anger, although 'piece of shit' is kind of close
well my bad
regardless I am led to believe that "cunt" is usually inoffensive to men unless used in a professional environment
what?
-
Different regions man. In the UK cunt can be said as a joke. In my area the word cunt is matched in offensiveness only by the words nigger and spic. In your area it might be a bit more loose.
Well it's Michigan, I would imagine either way "cunt" is offensive esp. to women
Aren't you a shining pinnacle of a great poster?
me, a man, who has never suffered a day of genuine discrimination in my life. unlike misogyny, misandry isn't a vast social ill which detrimentally affects the lives of countless people; it doesn't exist outside of backwater blogs on the internet.
Edited:
Not in the United States it isn't.
who are you to say I've never encountered discrimination in my life, and therefore as a result i cannot comment on these things?
just don't splash me with water and we won't have any problems
Edited:
How are you to know your discrimination was based on the fact you're a man?
except, for someone raised in American society (I understand that the word's social context is different overseas), you can't call a woman a cunt without being a misogynist, in the same way that you can't call a black person a nigger and then pretend to not being a giant fucking racist.
it's an inherently sexist term because it is a gendered insult.
the cunts and dicks are just flying every which way
Don't forget the assholes
I'm not saying you can't comment; I'm saying anyone who complains about "misandry" in modern American society is crying big fat crocodile tears because, to reiterate: it's not a vast social ill which yadda yadda yadda
I honestly am not particularly compelled to care about whether or not "dick" is a misandrist term because, right now, in this time and place, misandry isn't a big problem. We can worry about that problem once we've gotten the big problems (the pay gap, employment discrimination, the conservative war on female reproductive rights [all problems of misogyny]) have been dealt with.
That's a faulty comparison. Yelling at a neighbor is quite different than saying something on a televised debate.
Misogyny is a huge problem yeah, but it doesn't exclude misandry from existing, even if the latter is much rarer than the former.
The venue doesn't matter: saying "vagina" should never have any repercussions at all. It's a fucking medical term.
Edited:
But's the fucking gist: we don't you need to bring up misandry in every single discussion about misogyny or feminism because MISANDRY ISN'T SOMETHING THAT VAST SWATHS OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION SUFFER AT THE HANDS OF.
you don't have to bother mentioning it. trust us: us getting involved with feminism doesn't delegitimize that one terrible, terrible time Susie from math called some boy a dick, so you don't have to bring it up as if it were some sort of "counterexample to the causes of feminism". It isn't.
You've clearly never listened to any aussie conversation
hey, guy:
that's the disconnect: it's different in the United States
Um can't you say that misogyny itself helps perpetuate misandry? I mean you can look at examples like child custody. Women and men are viewed at as having two separate domestic roles, and those roles end up systematically persecuting both sides.
It can be caused by a patriarchy, but still demean men in a similar, if not fully analogous way.
Of course it shouldn't, but I think you missed my point completely.
Men are viewed differently by society but I would never call it misandry.
but that's not misandry. It doesn't root from any anti-male sentiment: it's men being collateral damage of misogyny.
I completely agree, and it's important point to note, that men can oftentimes be victims of misogynist attitudes themselves; but It's still misogyny that is at the core of those harmful attitudes.
Hahaha clearly you haven't been to Australia
cunt
you've never experienced discrimination for BEING A MAN, is what he meant
although he could have worded it slightly better I guess
oh my god you can't be serious
Australian culture 101: "oi, cunt" is an acceptable alternative to "hello"
For example, in that domestic roles example you used, both domestic role stereotypes are prescribed by misogynist attitudes. Sexism against women dictates that they, supposedly being the less powerful sex, have to stay at home and raise the family, and the same sexist attitude against women (they are less powerful/capable) leaves men to fill in the gap and leave the home to do labor to provide for the woman.
Both sexes are ultimately harmed (via being restricted to certain domestic roles) by a single, anti-woman social attitude.
Edited:
he very well could have experience prejudice, but not discrimination of any meaningful sort.
Interesting way to look at it; might help explain why women tend to receive favor when it comes to divorce trials (especially custody) and other legal problems.
Yes, but in my original post I was pointing out that Sanius stating that misandry does not exist is a fallacy. I think that Misogyny is a real and serious problem, but to state that misandry (A much smaller problem in comparison) does not exist is bad too.
Grabbed from that page
![]()