Doug52392 posted:
Yea, sorry. Next time I'll use a lot of advanced subjects that only people who know what Linux is would understand, throw in some mumbo jumbo about .so files and processor differentiations, and say "Linux is secure and stable if you know what your doing" to explain to people who have never heard of Linux what it actually is... yea, everyone would understand that!
I explained Linux properly unlike you did. Whether or not people choose to understand or learn about Linux is their choice. You're just butthurt because someone told you that you were wrong.
Doug52392 posted:
Look whose wrong now, the PS3 has 512MB RAM! Not 256mb RAM!
Wrong. The PS3 has 512MB of memory total but only 256 MB of it is system memory, the other 256 MB is dedicated graphics memory.
Doug52392 posted:
And I know using QEMU to emulate the processor and Wine to run SRCDS will use a lot of resources, but I just want to see if it will run better than the last computer I ran SRCDS on (a 6 year old Compaq PC, 256MB RAM, AMD Athlon XP 1.4ghz processor)
Why would you use WINE inside of a QEMU session? All you do is install a Windows OS inside of QEMU. For the PS3 to have to emulate x86 instructions and run an OS inside of an OS, I can guarantee you that it will be on an order of magnitude 100 times slower than a native x86 processor and unless you have some enormous swapfile partition it won't work period.
Doug52392 posted:
Also, you claimed there ARE viruses for Linux that are "nastier" than Windows viruses... and yet I have yet to find one.
Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. That's like saying "Hey, I've never seen Russia before, so it doesn't exist."
Doug52392 posted:
Again, you are wrong, because the only thing Linux has is small security holes or bugs. They are pretty severe (like one hole where you compile some C code, run the compiled file, and get instant root access, but it's been patched), but there are, by FAR, less security holes in Linux than Windows.
You say there are small security holes and that they give you root access? I would consider that to be a pretty major security breach, especially on servers that have very sensitive information. How would you like it if some hacker exploited into your server and stole top secret files and put you out of business?
Doug52392 posted:
Plus, when I heard about that specific security bug (the instant root access one), I knew within a day a patched kernel would be out, and it was! Meanwhile, it takes Microsoft weeks, even months or YEARS to fix holes.
It doesn't matter if it was patched the next day, the fact that it was there proves that Linux isn't the iron clad battleship that you make it out to be, it has flaws just like anything else does.
Like I said, you're butthurt because you got proven wrong. You can flame anyone all you want, it's not going to change anything.