Register
Events
Popular
More
Post #5681
THE ONLY GOOD POST YOU HAVEONLYEVER MADE
good work you are improving
-
-
that's one hell of a salmon
-
that chain around his arm must be uncomfortable
-
its a handcuff for tactical handcuffing action
EDIT:
wait fuck im retarded i read that wrong and thought you mean the one round his neck
-
there were pictures of random us army soldiers with them
interesting shitte
-
Apparently this is a CZ75
http://www.evike.com/product_info.ph...69fddb1f48d59e
I see no resemblance
-
-
regardless of it not being a proper CZ-75 i think it looks p. neat
-
Its a CZ-75 P-07, like it says:
http://www.cz-usa.com/products/view/cz-p07-duty/
-
one easy way to identify a CZ 75 derivative is the size of the slide. The original design had much of the slide contained in the frame, so you'll notice that the slide is short(from a side view). This applies to a lot of cz varients, where everything else is modded to the point of being unrecognizable.
-
Brazil's new service rifle looks like a Pimp My Gun creation
-
I don't get why some many countries want to make some kind of indigenous rifle. License an established, quality firearm. No issues with trying to unfuck your gun's design and you can get COTS upgrades and parts.
-
It's more or less just a modernized FAL chambered in 5.56.
-
so, why not a SCAR-L? It's a better design in pretty much every way, especially considering the reliability issues with the MD-97? To me that gun screams "We wanted to make our guns cool and modern so instead of fixing any real issues, we put rails on it, so that people can mount accessories that won't be mass issued until 2025, and designed a terrible stock."
-
Propably quite damn old, but still:
I don't know.
-
thats what we did, and got a rifle with a plastic extractor (f2000s)
other than that it's supposedly ok
-
So when your gun has shortcomings (and the SCAR-L you suggested is by no means a perfect gun), your license agreement precludes altering the design and producing a derivative. Plus it's much cheaper to design than to license.
-
Scar-l's still definitely a lot more reliable than the md-97 they went with, and has better ergos. Making derivatives is largely pointless anyway. Half of these countries, once they start making their own designs or "improvements", everything goes to shit. Just look at that buttstock. It looks just like some incompetent designer's idea of a scar or ACR stock, without any understanding of what makes the stock good. It has a shitty cheekweld, no cheekriser, and really shitty sling attachment points. Really, if you want a derivative, find the company you licensed the gun off and have them do it, like the g36KV.
While when licensing a gun, there are shortcomings, that's hardly an issue compared to the problems found when some country decides to roll their own. Look at the INSAS. It's a POS. Mexico's xiuhcoatl? ehhh, pretty much a g36 without the patented features.
Admittedly, countries have tried to buy COTS rifles to disastrous results. Georgia bought a ton of Bushmaster ARs when they could have got Colts for a similar price. Really, the root issue comes down to corruption and bad research.
-
So everyone should just stop developing and attempting to improve firearms designs and just buy existing designs and succeed in bringing firearms development to a grinding halt?
Whatever you say pumpkin
-
When I was scrolling up I genuinely thought it was a PMG gun. I'm not even joking.Brazil's new service rifle looks like a Pimp My Gun creation
-
You uh, don't seem to have a problem with the T91... it is an indigenous rifle after all...
-
In brazil's defence, they didn't just put a stock and rails on They put on a new pistol grip, too
-
-
Not quite. My point was that these countries shouldn't waste time making indigenous firearms like the INSAS or whatever. First off, these indigenous firearms don't really contribute to the industry anyway, since most of them are bad rip offs or existing designs, with nothing new to add. Do you actually think some poor ass country can start from scratch and build a better, more innovative rifle than an established company, which already has everything in place? Bureaucrats should stick to what they know.
The whole indigenous rifle shit stinks of corruption. I'd bet that one of the main reasons they roll their own is to cut costs and to give work to subcontractors they hold shares in. There's really no other reason to build an indigenous rifle. If you want a custom gun, ask a real company to do it, they won't turn down a huge contract just because you have a few requests.
Edited:
It's supposed to be good, but it's a piston clone of a m16. not hugely innovative, admittedly moreso than that HK416 everyone was jizzing on. A lot of good indigenous rifles are clones. Type 89 is a AR18.
-
high speed low drag chest hair
also costa has a nice body
-
we get it youre gay
-
i was gonna say that
also no he doesn't
-
Indian army cadets
-
Whats up with the fail camo?Indian army cadets
-
works in the average indian store
-
There's an Indian store near where I live, and I can confirm that.
They have some pretty neat stuff though.
-
kinda reminds me a little bit of a sigBrazil's new service rifle looks like a Pimp My Gun creation
-
THE TAVAR THIRTY SIX
-
what is that abomination
Edited:
-
looks like the distance between the stock and grip are long as fuc and uncomfortable and as an ironic twist, it takes the ak bayonet and stanags at the same time
-
lol the flashlight is so badly placed
"you want to put your weak hand on handguard? no! I put flashlight there now you can't hold gun."
also lol carry handle. You don't need a carry handle on an assault rifle, that shit is so 90s.
-
actually, besides heavy machineguns and other heavy weaponry, what the fuck are carrying handles even for?
-
They look cool.
Edited:
No point with em if you got a sling though.
-
Hmm, ghost page!
-
nooooope.
Agree x 6
Friendly x 1
Funny x 1
Dumb x 1
Disagree x 1
Informative x 2
Optimistic x 1
