Register
Events
Popular
More
Post #1
We all know what happened on 9/11. This thread isn't about the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. We've all seen the videos of the planes hitting the towers and such. But this is about what people don't know. What most people don't know is, a third building collapsed that day. The circumstances around its collapse continue to be a topic of interest to people around the world.
World Trade Center 7 during 9/11
This building oversaw the entire WTC complex that the massive towers occupied. Also in the complex were WTC buildings 3, 4, 5 and 6. These buildings were found still standing, although heavily damaged and covered in immense amounts of debris.
The strange thing is, these buildings were left standing even AFTER building 7 went down. Despite the fact that you can clearly see WTC 7 is the furthest from ground zero.
WTC 5 and 6 are covered in debris and heavily damaged, and yet still standing. Why did WTC 7 collapse despite being even further away?
These peculiarities and more should be taken very seriously, I encourage discussion from all sides.
The Bush Administration submitted the 342-page USA PATRIOT Act to Congress on September 24th, 2001, just 13 days after the attack. Other legislation would follow, but most of the policies enacted in the name of the War on Terror would be accomplished through executive orders.
Two Senators who attempted to slow the passage of the PATRIOT Act received letters containing Anthax.
Those of you who are interested in more information I encourage you to watch this video: http://openvideo.dailymotion.com/vid...=12#from=embed
-
-
Peer pressure.
-
Maybe the fire and the shock wave when one of the towers came down helped bring
-
There was actually a large amount of damage on WTC7, as you can see here.
-
I'm assuming WTC 7 got fucked up by fire too, it was just the unlucky building.
-
look at the other WTC buildings, they are completely WRECKED by debris and still stood no problem. that looks like minimal damage at best.
Edited:
Plus not to mention the building collapsed in under 10 seconds...
-
Planned explosion. /thread
-
its obama, bush, and reagan's ghost plotting against america cOnSpIrAcY~~~~~~
Edited:
sara palin 2011 :911:
-
The building had a quite a large fire burning inside, and to your bogus second point.
-
Who cares?
I mean seriously, what good will a 10 page circle jerk do?
-
If you don't like to discuss things in General Discussion then you can just leave.
-
It was hit by flying debris.
-
http://openvideo.dailymotion.com/vid...=12#from=embed
Watch this video and you'll realize that grainy footage and slowed film don't make a very good convincing argument.
-
Things are going to get funny in here.
-
Even so it'd be impossible for that to be completely in it's own footprint , that would've gone forward with damage like thatThere was actually a large amount of damage on WTC7, as you can see here.
-
Oh ho ho.
Here's my discussion:
In a fit of rage, Signore Mario came over to the greatest and grandest of the Americas, Northern America. He traversed across rivers, bogs, and big hills that weren't quite tall enough to be mountains. After a while, he reached New York, and here he began to realise just how fucking much he despised the USA (it was much greater than he had previously thought). Using his 2D-side-scrolling-game leet jumping skills, he launched himself into the air and stomped down the two twin towers. Afterwards, he masturbated exuberantly onto the WTC 7 building which set alight from the friction his enormous semen created.
The end.
-
I just don't get why it fell down so perfectly.
If it fell from that, wouldn't it have fallen sideways instead of straight down?
-
Now the new tallest WTC building, WTC 7 simply couldn't handle the pressure of the spotlight and collapsed.
-
OP already has his mind set on there being a conspiracy. No amount of facts and logic is going to change that.
-
Yeah lets watch another wacky conspiracy video with no sources.
I found a site that you should read, I'm basically regurgitating what's on it.
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
-
Say my name. Say it three times and I'll slap you with some computer facts.
November 2007
9,242 Posts
WTC 7, in case you didn't notice, was the third-tallest, and was higher than it was wide, like most skyscrapers. Compare to the other buildings, which were just a few stories tall, and had very wide foundations. So it was already less stable than WTC 3-6. So it had less ability to support itself under unexpected loads.
-
Not with a raging fire inside slowly demolishing it almost as explosive charges would.
I was posting that more to prove against the point of "HURR IT DIDN'T HAVE ANY DAMAGE"
-
giant buildings are sort of unpredictable when they collapse. The building falling down in a slightly different way than you would expect doesn't mean that a government conspiracy is the only possible explanation.
-
-
Didn't even watch it did you? otherwise you'd know it does have sources to back it's claims. I guess no amount of facts or logic will change your mindset.
-
Nope, why not? Because I'm not some idiot that thinks my government is out to get me. Grow up.Didn't even watch it did you? otherwise you'd know it does have sources to back it's claims. I guess no amount of facts or logic will change your mindset.
Edited:
I'm sure everything in that video is debunked on that link.
-
This post only yet furthers my point and only shows your own insecurities being projected onto others. This is about knowing the truth. Wake up.
-
goddamnit guy
9/11 was on saturday, this is the wrong day to post this
-
WAKE UP SHEEPLE.
Could you be anymore cliché?
-
What happened happened, who gives a shit.
-
If you still believe Al-Qaeda was behind 9/11 I'm afraid there's no hope for you. Go back to watching MTV.
This isn't about feeling superior by the way. This is about realizing that once you pass a certain point... there's no point showing more evidence since you will still believe the government's story anyway, no matter what that evidence is.
Case in point: someone could tell 'go on then, show me evidence...' etc. Then they will say "that's not evidence, bla bla bla" until the cows come home.
-
Those buildings also stood lower than WTC 7, which means they can sustain more damage structurally and still remain standing. Look how much more weight the supports of WTC 7 had to bear. Why would the 'insiders' put charges on a building that was not 'planned' to be hit with an airplane that day? That would be just stupid on their part.
Who cares if the building collapsed in under 10 seconds.. It doesn't take long for a structure that size to fall.
-
-
Well that sucks, because I certainly feel superior over a bunch of crazy people that think that their own government is out to kill them.
Maybe that's just me.
-
Seriously, Compare this, which didn't collapse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtVRma5QS6k
With this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTy3RYDj0lk
-
My points are basically all rooting from the video in the link, and that question as well as many others are answered and addressed as well as backed up with sources. I urge you to watch it and see for yourself.
-
Generally you're meant to properly analyse what he's linking before you make your call.
-
OP in 3 seconds: "i'm one of those nut jobs who still thinks 9/11 was an inside job"
-
You do realize that not only different countries have different building codes, but even different states and counties? There are any number of reasons why one building will fall from a fire and another won't.
You can't just post a random building on fire and go "SEE THAT DIDN'T FALL". There are way too many variables to take into account.
-
I'm just a young person who feels their duty is to call out injustices and shed light on the crap our government wants to keep in the dark.
x 112
x 25
x 4
x 1
x 1
x 1
x 1
Bad Reading x 1
Optimistic x 1
