1. Post #3761
    RG4
    RG4's Avatar
    November 2010
    2,889 Posts
    Know what'd be interesting right now? If somewhere out in this world there's a team of people trying to port New Vegas to the Creation engine.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 3Winner Winner x 1 (list)

  2. Post #3762
    Gold Member
    Starship's Avatar
    March 2011
    3,186 Posts
    Hey Gmonk, can you reupload your radio mod?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Sweden Show Events

  3. Post #3763
    Gold Member
    Zezibesh's Avatar
    May 2008
    17,195 Posts
    Dead Money is starting to piss me off. The Cloud was already bad enough (playing hardcore), my holorifle broke, and now that I'm inside the casino THERE'S THOSE FUCKING RED SPEAKERS EVERYWHERE JESUS CHRIST

    Edited:

    Oh and outside in the villa looking at a certain direction dropped my FPS to around 11, when otherwise it was at 60.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Finland Show Events Funny Funny x 5 (list)

  4. Post #3764
    Gold Member
    tyanet's Avatar
    June 2007
    3,108 Posts
    Fallout isn't exactly meant to be post-apocalyptic misery, it's about rebuilding society. Just look at the direction FO1, FO2 and FO:NV were headed. Compared to that plotline FO3 is more like a spinoff than a sequel.
    But in New Vegas, things are pretty much already rebuilt. Where can you go on from that? If they make a game that's in the same setting as New Vegas, you're looking at more of a game that's about fighting a war than it is about rebuilding society.

    That's why I'm saying you go back to just after The Great War, before people are armed and organized. And your goal should be to round up who you can, and get them focused on some outside threat.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  5. Post #3765
    RagerTrader's Avatar
    September 2011
    1,634 Posts
    But in New Vegas, things are pretty much already rebuilt. Where can you go on from that? If they make a game that's in the same setting as New Vegas, you're looking at more of a game that's about fighting a war than it is about rebuilding society.

    That's why I'm saying you go back to just after The Great War, before people are armed and organized. And your goal should be to round up who you can, and get them focused on some outside threat.
    The best way to aproach future fallout games is like New Vegas did, only more directly- "The Frontier".

    Civilized groups like the NCR and Eastern BoS reaching out to gain and rebuild territory. I hope the next fallout game takes place in the Northwest (Oregon, Washington, etc) or the Southeast (Georgia, Florida, Virginia, etc.)
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista Netherlands Show Events Agree Agree x 4 (list)

  6. Post #3766
    "These fuckers don't deserve a 'humane' punishment. They don't deserve to be called human. They don't even deserve to be called shit. Gas chamber is minimum acceptable punishment."
    lavacano's Avatar
    October 2008
    11,846 Posts
    The best way to aproach future fallout games is like New Vegas did, only more directly- "The Frontier".

    Civilized groups like the NCR and Eastern BoS reaching out to gain and rebuild territory. I hope the next fallout game takes place in the Northwest (Oregon, Washington, etc) or the Southeast (Georgia, Florida, Virginia, etc.)
    I'm going to be so pissed if they say the Space Needle got knocked down.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Linux United States Show Events Agree Agree x 7Funny Funny x 2 (list)

  7. Post #3767
    Gold Member
    Generic.Monk's Avatar
    October 2010
    11,963 Posts
    Hey Gmonk, can you reupload your radio mod?

    Isn't it still on mediafire? Remember I said I was gonna do some more shit with it but that never materialised and I'm busy with shittons of bullshit right now :/

    link still works, here ya go
    http://www.mediafire.com/?ie13joel6et310y
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events

  8. Post #3768
    M.Ciaster's Avatar
    November 2010
    2,048 Posts
    I'm going to be so pissed if they say the Space Needle got knocked down.
    Fallout is all about visiting the ruined versions of famous cities and visiting landmarks that somehow managed to stay intact. If the Washington Monument could've survived, so did the Space Needle.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows XP Poland Show Events Disagree Disagree x 3 (list)

  9. Post #3769
    Gold Member
    Starship's Avatar
    March 2011
    3,186 Posts
    Isn't it still on mediafire? Remember I said I was gonna do some more shit with it but that never materialised and I'm busy with shittons of bullshit right now :/

    link still works, here ya go
    http://www.mediafire.com/?ie13joel6et310y
    Sorry, forgot to check OP.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Sweden Show Events

  10. Post #3770
    LtKyle2's Avatar
    March 2011
    3,154 Posts
    Dead Money is starting to piss me off. The Cloud was already bad enough (playing hardcore), my holorifle broke, and now that I'm inside the casino THERE'S THOSE FUCKING RED SPEAKERS EVERYWHERE JESUS CHRIST

    Edited:

    Oh and outside in the villa looking at a certain direction dropped my FPS to around 11, when otherwise it was at 60.
    You should've bought the blood clotting augmention upgrade thing at the vegas clinic, pretty much nullifies the cloud.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Informative Informative x 1 (list)

  11. Post #3771
    The Disabled Kid
    Zarjk's Avatar
    February 2011
    4,538 Posts
    Tamriel must be in Kentucky or something.
    I feel loved, thanks.

    I am sophisticated...
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  12. Post #3772
    Fhenexx's Avatar
    December 2009
    4,593 Posts
    I personally wouldn't have a problem with Bethseda developing Fallout 4 if they had some of the original writers and developers on board to help keep the game closer to the actual canon and not make the very many mistakes they made in Fallout 3 (e.g. Vault 87 having FEV).
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  13. Post #3773
    Gold Member
    kaine123's Avatar
    February 2010
    7,270 Posts
    I think that Seattle would make a great Fallout location.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 7 (list)

  14. Post #3774
    cdr248's Avatar
    August 2009
    6,171 Posts
    Why are we all losing hope in Fallout 4 now?
    Because Bethesda is probably making it and it would be better off if Obsidian developed it. Personally I find that Skyrim had boring everything. The characters, the quests, the world, and just the main story over all kind of sucked. The ending felt like you had no affect on the world and I would rather have the game END normally with a great ending then continue playing after the quest to just have a mediocre ending with no affect on the world.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows XP United States Show Events Agree Agree x 4Dumb Dumb x 1Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  15. Post #3775
    Krinkels's Avatar
    March 2011
    2,494 Posts
    Fallout is all about visiting the ruined versions of famous cities and visiting landmarks that somehow managed to stay intact. If the Washington Monument could've survived, so did the Space Needle.
    It should be noted that that bizarre white tower in Fallout 3 was not, in fact, the Washington Monument. Note the mysterious elevator and frame that mysteriously appeared in the middle of what was the world's most amazing piece of masonry. This suggests the presence of a similar monument which survived when the Washington was completely obliterated.

    Thus, the Clinton Monument.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  16. Post #3776
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,632 Posts
    But in New Vegas, things are pretty much already rebuilt. Where can you go on from that? If they make a game that's in the same setting as New Vegas, you're looking at more of a game that's about fighting a war than it is about rebuilding society.

    That's why I'm saying you go back to just after The Great War, before people are armed and organized. And your goal should be to round up who you can, and get them focused on some outside threat.
    You want the Fallout equivalent of the reapers? No thanks. Instead of a single huge threat, why not focus on making a piece of land "safe". Clear out critters and settle a town. This could be the first 3 quests after leaving a vault. Then scout for supplies, only to meet other factions that have been out for maybe 3,5,10 years at this time and some are welcoming to trade relations, while others just want you to fuck off and so. You could even change factions when/if you decide that your people's stance towards the world is shit.

    Maybe a "heritage" subplot from some vault-tec scientists who wanted to pass on some of their experiment or another legacy. Nigguh-i-dunno. It could go anywhere depending on how much you follow lore. I'm in for the ride, but it better not be the fucking clone these past 3 bethesda games have been. They're like the IDENTICAL formula...

    Edited:

    Fallout is all about visiting the ruined versions of famous cities and visiting landmarks that somehow managed to stay intact. If the Washington Monument could've survived, so did the Space Needle.
    Play the first two and repeat that. It's NOT the focus of the game. It's a minor selling point in Fo3 and it's suddenly the core of it? wat?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Mac Denmark Show Events Agree Agree x 11 (list)

  17. Post #3777
    Gold Member
    UnidentifiedFlyingTard's Avatar
    March 2009
    7,454 Posts
    Minor selling point? that's the whole point of Fallout 3.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)

  18. Post #3778
    Krinkels's Avatar
    March 2011
    2,494 Posts
    [editline]
    Play the first two and repeat that. It's NOT the focus of the game. It's a minor selling point in Fo3 and it's suddenly the core of it? wat?
    Dude, Generic Californian One-Story Building #27 is definitely an intact landmark and Junktown is the ruined version of Generic Californian Desert Expanse #30,071,997. It's totally the core.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events Funny Funny x 12 (list)

  19. Post #3779
    Gold Member
    Mr. Someguy's Avatar
    March 2006
    20,420 Posts
    Fallout is all about visiting the ruined versions of famous cities and visiting landmarks that somehow managed to stay intact. If the Washington Monument could've survived, so did the Space Needle.
    Except the White House.

    Edited:

    Also what everyone else said. Also famous buildings in Las Vegas are not present in FONV, like the Luxor Las Vegas, which is probably the first building I think of when I think of LV.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  20. Post #3780
    Gold Member
    tyanet's Avatar
    June 2007
    3,108 Posts
    You want the Fallout equivalent of the reapers? No thanks. Instead of a single huge threat, why not focus on making a piece of land "safe". Clear out critters and settle a town. This could be the first 3 quests after leaving a vault. Then scout for supplies, only to meet other factions that have been out for maybe 3,5,10 years at this time and some are welcoming to trade relations, while others just want you to fuck off and so. You could even change factions when/if you decide that your people's stance towards the world is shit.

    Maybe a "heritage" subplot from some vault-tec scientists who wanted to pass on some of their experiment or another legacy. Nigguh-i-dunno. It could go anywhere depending on how much you follow lore. I'm in for the ride, but it better not be the fucking clone these past 3 bethesda games have been. They're like the IDENTICAL formula...
    That's pretty much exactly what I was trying to say, thanks for saying what I was trying to say
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Friendly Friendly x 1 (list)

  21. Post #3781
    Gammashack's Avatar
    March 2009
    534 Posts
    For every time I hear about Denver in fallout, I would expect the next one to be in it (which I wouldn't dislike).
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  22. Post #3782
    RagerTrader's Avatar
    September 2011
    1,634 Posts
    For every time I hear about Denver in fallout, I would expect the next one to be in it (which I wouldn't dislike).
    It was in Van Buren.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista Netherlands Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  23. Post #3783
    Gold Member
    SonicHitman's Avatar
    April 2009
    4,963 Posts
    I can care less if the next Fallout game took place in Chicago, New York, etc.
    I only want it to take place in the North, mainly North East.
    And the whole "Great Winter" idea would be awesome. Radiated animals with strong coats of fur or skin to protect themselves, thugs and raiders in the skyscrapers and neighborhoods, ghouls and a bunch of other enemies in the everlasting sewers because they can't survive the cold outside.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  24. Post #3784
    Gold Member
    Mr. Someguy's Avatar
    March 2006
    20,420 Posts
    For every time I hear about Denver in fallout, I would expect the next one to be in it (which I wouldn't dislike).
    So, more Caesar's Legion then?


    I only want it to take place in the North, mainly North East.
    Philadelphia!
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  25. Post #3785
    JCDentonUNATCO's Avatar
    November 2010
    3,831 Posts
    I'd just like some true urban environment. D.C. was a big joke and there were only like 4 buildings you could go in that weren't under 2 stories high. And lets not forget insurmountable invisible wall'd rubble piles that destroyed a lot of the free roam ability in the downtown.

    I mean, don't get me wrong, the Capital Wasteland Countryside was alright, but it wasn't that interesting having to traverse across boring dirt and rocks and killing Bloatfly #4958485. Although I guess the same could be said for New Vegas, but at least the dirt and rocks weren't a horrible eyesore and there was the occasional cactus or crashed B-29 bomber to mix things up.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 11 (list)

  26. Post #3786
    Gold Member
    Speedstream's Avatar
    February 2006
    1,234 Posts
    I think it'd be cool if they visited other countries. What about England? France?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Disagree Disagree x 14 (list)

  27. Post #3787
    Gold Member
    UnidentifiedFlyingTard's Avatar
    March 2009
    7,454 Posts
    Except that wouldn't be very Fallouty now would it.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events Agree Agree x 12 (list)

  28. Post #3788
    Magmacow358's Avatar
    July 2010
    2,801 Posts
    This thread is so predictable it has its own cycle.

    1: People bitching about fallout 3

    2: Actually talking about new vegas

    3: Fallout 4 speculation

    4: Fallout 3 vs New vegas

    5: Locations for Fallout 4/Fallout can only be in america

    I could probably send this entire thread into another shitstorm just by asking: "Which is better, fallout 3 or new vegas?"
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events Agree Agree x 6Funny Funny x 2Useful Useful x 1 (list)

  29. Post #3789
    Gold Member
    TheDecryptor's Avatar
    September 2006
    3,077 Posts
    Fallout has been set wherever the developers wanted it to be, it could just as easily be set in whats left of Russia as well (Russia tech basically personifies Fallout tech, they used portable nuclear generators, made spaceships that used valves, etc.)

    The atmosphere of Fallout isn't limited to just the USA, it could just as easily be applied to other locations (Mexico sounds pretty similar from what Raul said, etc.)
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Australia Show Events

  30. Post #3790
    Gold Member
    Drakortha's Avatar
    November 2011
    888 Posts
    This thread is so predictable it has its own cycle.
    I could probably send this entire thread into another shitstorm just by asking: "Which is better, fallout 3 or new vegas?"

    "New Vegas is a better RPG hands down. Fallout 3 was just a rock climbing simulator"

    *hides*
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Australia Show Events Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)

  31. Post #3791
    LtKyle2's Avatar
    March 2011
    3,154 Posts
    "New Vegas is a better RPG hands down. Fallout 3 was just a rock climbing simulator"

    *hides*
    oh god where's that comic of some guy saying something and a whole crowd of people turn into monsters.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 7 (list)

  32. Post #3792
    jackteam54's Avatar
    November 2011
    404 Posts
    I have way too much ammo in Fallout: New Vegas, I have over 10,000 .50 MG rounds. This game is too easy...
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista United States Show Events

  33. Post #3793
    Konigstiger96's Avatar
    January 2009
    1,567 Posts
    In the new Fallout I want more settlements like Arefu and Denver. I mean Arefu makes a lot of sense, why aren't there more settlements that way?

    Denver seems so cool. Settlements in the buildings, on the buildings, bridges that connect all the settlements. The ground is this cesspit of enemies who shoot at you as you cross the bridges. Then if possible, you get to screw over settlements by destroying their bridges. For example Settlement A could tell you that they hate Settlemnt B and want them out of the picture, now you can either slaughter all of Settlement B or destroy their bridges.

    Actually it's just that I like the idea of really high-rise living in a post-apocalyptic world

    Edited:

    oh god where's that comic of some guy saying something and a whole crowd of people turn into monsters.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Singapore Show Events Agree Agree x 4 (list)

  34. Post #3794
    Gold Member
    tyanet's Avatar
    June 2007
    3,108 Posts
    This:

    In the new Fallout I want more settlements like Arefu and Denver. I mean Arefu makes a lot of sense, why aren't there more settlements that way?

    Denver seems so cool. Settlements in the buildings, on the buildings, bridges that connect all the settlements. The ground is this cesspit of enemies who shoot at you as you cross the bridges. Then if possible, you get to screw over settlements by destroying their bridges. For example Settlement A could tell you that they hate Settlemnt B and want them out of the picture, now you can either slaughter all of Settlement B or destroy their bridges.

    Actually it's just that I like the idea of really high-rise living in a post-apocalyptic world
    This:

    I'd just like some true urban environment. D.C. was a big joke and there were only like 4 buildings you could go in that weren't under 2 stories high. And lets not forget insurmountable invisible wall'd rubble piles that destroyed a lot of the free roam ability in the downtown.

    I mean, don't get me wrong, the Capital Wasteland Countryside was alright, but it wasn't that interesting having to traverse across boring dirt and rocks and killing Bloatfly #4958485. Although I guess the same could be said for New Vegas, but at least the dirt and rocks weren't a horrible eyesore and there was the occasional cactus or crashed B-29 bomber to mix things up.
    And this:

    I can care less if the next Fallout game took place in Chicago, New York, etc.
    I only want it to take place in the North, mainly North East.
    And the whole "Great Winter" idea would be awesome. Radiated animals with strong coats of fur or skin to protect themselves, thugs and raiders in the skyscrapers and neighborhoods, ghouls and a bunch of other enemies in the everlasting sewers because they can't survive the cold outside.
    Are where fallout should go next, at least setting wise.

    Edited:

    Hell, I just want somewhere where it rains/snows/both. It would be nice if the storms could vary in intensity, ranging from light rain/snow to a full force thunderstorm/blizzard.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  35. Post #3795
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,632 Posts
    This thread is so predictable it has its own cycle.

    1: People bitching about fallout 3

    2: Actually talking about new vegas

    3: Fallout 4 speculation

    4: Fallout 3 vs New vegas

    5: Locations for Fallout 4/Fallout can only be in america

    I could probably send this entire thread into another shitstorm just by asking: "Which is better, fallout 3 or new vegas?"
    6. Someone calls the cycle out. (been me the past two times).

    As for the shitstorm: Which is better? Fo2 or Fo: New Vegas. There we go.

    Edited:

    In the new Fallout I want more settlements like Arefu and Denver. I mean Arefu makes a lot of sense, why aren't there more settlements that way?

    Denver seems so cool. Settlements in the buildings, on the buildings, bridges that connect all the settlements. The ground is this cesspit of enemies who shoot at you as you cross the bridges. Then if possible, you get to screw over settlements by destroying their bridges. For example Settlement A could tell you that they hate Settlemnt B and want them out of the picture, now you can either slaughter all of Settlement B or destroy their bridges.

    Actually it's just that I like the idea of really high-rise living in a post-apocalyptic world

    Edited:
    This is what Bethesda does. They make a whole fucking faction with background lore and intrigue JUST to blow it all up in a single quest and never interact with them again. New Vegas did the opposite. The only quest related to "FUck up X faction" was the NCR prison VS primm / Goodsprings VS boomers and the ending. In all 3 cases a boatload of quests for each faction went before.

    I'll crap a bear if another Fo3 enclave happens... That was a disaster.....
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Mac Denmark Show Events

  36. Post #3796
    RG4
    RG4's Avatar
    November 2010
    2,889 Posts
    Does Zenpod anymore plans to expand Merc Radio?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  37. Post #3797
    coco911231's Avatar
    August 2009
    7,894 Posts
    So I finally got Requiem for The Capital Wasteland to work, but I had to use old ass version .4AE.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  38. Post #3798
    Krinkels's Avatar
    March 2011
    2,494 Posts
    I'll crap a bear if another Fo3 enclave happens... That was a disaster.....
    Calling Toxx on this one.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events

  39. Post #3799
    Movie quote goes here, because...
    Bomimo's Avatar
    October 2008
    7,632 Posts
    Toxx?

    Edit:

    Found something. Oh shit! Nope nope!
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Denmark Show Events Funny Funny x 3Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  40. Post #3800
    RagerTrader's Avatar
    September 2011
    1,634 Posts
    This is what Bethesda does. They make a whole fucking faction with background lore and intrigue JUST to blow it all up in a single quest and never interact with them again. New Vegas did the opposite. The only quest related to "FUck up X faction" was the NCR prison VS primm / Goodsprings VS boomers and the ending. In all 3 cases a boatload of quests for each faction went before.

    I'll crap a bear if another Fo3 enclave happens... That was a disaster.....
    What about the Mojave BoS and Camp Searchlight?


    Someone gives you instructions to destroy them before you may have even seen the places.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows Vista Netherlands Show Events