1. Post #1
    cagoule's Avatar
    November 2007
    29 Posts
    GWarfare or the greatest game that could be

    Introduction
    http://www.sci.fi/~fta/storm-02.htm
    "The Allies had monitored the Iraqi IADS closely throughout the buildup period of Desert Shield, deploying a range of Elint (Electronic Intelligence gathering) assets to the theatre. These assets served the principal purpose of mapping out the Iraqi Electronic Order of Battle (EOoB), ie pinpointing the deployments and composition of Iraq's air defence batteries and supporting radar systems, and mapping out the stations and frequencies used for command and control of the network.

    Key systems employed were various subtypes of the EC/RC-135 Rivet Joint, the high flying TR-1 (U-2), the US Navy's EP-3 and EKA-3B aircraft and the RAF's Nimrod R.1. These aircraft were strategically positioned to cover particular sectors of IADS coverage when Allied aircraft, in the period preceding hostilities, feigned penetrations of Iraqi airspace. This is the oldest trick in the electronic warfare book and the Iraqis fell for it repeatedly, lighting up their radars to engage the would be inbounds, in doing so they provided the monitoring Elint platforms with their positions and the identities of their radars, in turn betraying the composition of their batteries. It is also very likely that the Iraqis indulged in the luxury of live testing and calibration of their radars, further assisting the Allied effort.

    With Elint equipment of appropriate capability it is possible to determine not only the type of emitter, but also often which model or subtype and its standard of calibration, all from the monitored and recorded emissions.

    The Iraqis violated a fundamental principle of electronic combat by lighting up radars outside of actual engagements, and then not moving or reshuffling their assets to invalidate Allied reconnaissance. Were they to have done the proper thing, they would have moved batteries to dummy SAM sites, lit up in the presence of Allied Elint aircraft, and then shifted the batteries to implement a scheme of tactical or strategic deception. If this is implemented properly, and appropriate emission control discipline enforced, it becomes very difficult for the attacking party to map out what the real structure of the target IADS is. This in turn makes the planning of a pre-emptive strike very difficult, as with the increasing complexity of the deception the risk of not taking out all key assets in the initial hit increases vastly.

    By the middle of January the Allies had a comprehensive picture of Iraq's IADS and were well positioned for a knock-out blow against the system, with substantial hard kill defence suppression assets in the theatre. Key systems were the F-4G Wild Weasel, a Phantom airframe fitted with a potent radar homing and warning receiver system (APR-47 RHAWS), which was supplemented by the HARM firing F-16C and F/A-18C. These aircraft were further supported by Alarm firing Tornado GR.1s of the RAF and HARM capable EA-6B Prowlers, A-7Es and A-6Es of the USN.

    Jamming assets assembled in the theatre included USAF EC-130 Compass Call standoff communications jammers, Naval EA-6B Prowlers and the USAF's EF-111A Ravens. The protracted buildup was a major benefit to the Allies, who used the time to upgrade both hardware and software in many of the jamming systems, to precisely match the Iraqi inventory. Unlike the Israelis in 1973, who carried the wrong jammers and warning receivers for the threat at hand, the Allies had the best of intelligence and used it to the fullest.

    The Allied planners envisaged a three pronged strategy for winning the electronic battle, concentrating on the simultaneous implementation of the following objectives:

    * suppression of enemy air defences (SEAD) via jamming, anti-radiation missiles, decoys and precision guided weapons delivered by penetrating aircraft and standoff platforms.
    * crippling the C3 network by jamming with EC-130 Compass Call aircraft, until key nodes could be destroyed by strike aircraft.
    * the use of onboard Defensive ECM by penetrating aircraft to defeat any SAMs which would get airborne in spite of the preceding activity.

    The coup was meticulously planned, with the principal objective of the first phase of the SEAD campaign being the earliest possible paralysis of the GCI/EW network via the killing of key radar and C3 sites, this to be achieved by a series of simultaneous attacks by a range of different aircraft types.

    Once the network was paralysed, individual area defences and point defences would have to light up their local radars to acquire inbound Allied aircraft and thus expose themselves. The local area defences would then be attacked by SEAD aircraft attached to inbound strike packages, with the twofold objectives of preventing attrition of strike aircraft and inflicting attrition upon elements of the IADS, thus implementing the second phase of the SEAD campaign. "
    Such is the story of how modern wars are won and lost. The Fourth largest army in the world was wiped out and stomped flat by superior technology, tactics and firepower; even if they far outnumbered their foes. With computers still being in their relatively early years, and the information age even younger, it is normal that little in the way of recreating this kind of setting exists.

    Gmod is certainly the most versatile game in history. Never before has so much creative power been given to a user in such an immersive, high-performance physics engine. If it is to be taken as a standard of sandbox games, what the future holds none can tell. An unexploited, as it seems, facet of Gmod is the ability to simulate almost any kind of device or vehicle with some degree of apparent realism. Basic concepts remain viable in any frame, Real or Simulated, and gmod has often been used as a simulation environment. The greatest could-be offshoot of Gmod is in it's capability to replicate true warfare. In this gamemode that is Half Build, Half SeriousRP, All War it is the most technically savvy, quick-thinking and tactician player who will triumph over the mindless quick-aiming RDM'er. Echoes of DarkRP servers wiped out by massed missile attacks.

    True Warfare would be defined as forces fighting each other as systems; containing a rigid organization and operational procedures, emphasizing the carrying out of orders and discipline; using every kind of weapon and advantage possible... as opposed to a Chivalric mano-a-mano individual combat with an overwhelming preponderance of firearms and an almost total absence of secondary support, ignoring technological developments. That was quite a mouthful! But i hope i have described it well. You will have recognized most HL2/Gmod mods as the second category, wich follows HL2. This is no coincidence, it is due to the target age of the game and the fact that it is made 'for fun'. If you are like me, you find simulations that give you challenges not usually encountered in video games VERY fun.

    But infinite possibilities exist in Gmod for any number of players to team up in a military effort not unlike real life. Good rules and control of what wiremod features can be used can keep an important balance wich will keep too overpowered weapons from being used unfairly (like Lyinginbedmon's formless-horror-robot slaughtering everything), or to keep within a period of history. It can be assumed that better addons for radios and sensors may appear, but in this gamemode a great incentive can be found to create them. Simply a target finder that can be located due to it being on, much like an Advanced Radio, would be an acceptable simulation of Radar. I will outline ideas for addons later. There are also limitations one needs to set into the game, some novel. "Earshot Range Only" chat and voice reception is a must, to force the use of communications devices. Also,an important requirement for this type of gamemode is a maximum-size map with a high skybox to give a truly large possible battlespace and maneuvering space for aerial warfare. A "Space" ceiling a la "spacegrass" opens up mouth-watering possibilities in Space Warfare (Satellites and Missiles, not Stardestroyers, X-Wings and Death Stars).

    The most important aspect of GWarfare is that it is first and foremost a TEAM deathmatch, or other gamemode, but always a TEAM effort. Hierarchy; Command, Control and Communications (C3) are critical wether the force structure is cellular and independent or a rigid pyramid. The name of the game is always to have greater firepower (power*numbers) than the enemy. Pitted against each other with wiremod at their disposition, teams will effectively engage in a technological Arms race where the lessons that where learned with the price of real blood during the countless conflicts of the Post-Industrial age can be applied. Giving the three players tanks would be a good start, but their Area of Influence is decidedly small, their firepower Average and their situational awareness mediocre at best. The players will always be too little to make a difference on their own, the key is the weapon systems they control.

    Quick, Cheap n' Dirty Information-age controllers (E2, CPU, ect) give an infinite flexibility to automating what the players can develop. Instead of fighting themselves, they may code and build robots to fight at their place; giving each player the presence, firepower and Úlan of four players, depending on how well the robots perform. The enemy would be well advised to match this provocation with the same model, but an asymmetrical response is sometimes the best Answer. Consider if these robots are given target information and orders by radio, it would be possible to interfere with their good functioning; here Electronic Warfare comes into play.

    A whole Gmod server could be made on 'Wizard Warfare' as Electronic Warfare is called (given we have nerdy enough players) due to the wide array of options that Gmod gives to transmit data. A force coordinating their messages through a string-to-radio system on a fixed frequency may find themselves being jammed, or even worst, being Eavesdropped. Even more insidious, if not even the most basic security measured are arranged, false messages and data can wreck the best laid plans with Disinformation Warfare.

    All three tiers of modern fighting; Ground, Aerospace and Sea; could be simulated in Gmod, even all at once if the necessary manpower, will and computing power is there. If Naval Warfare in Gmod is to be any more than glorified Ironside-era broadsiding; weapon systems must be developed to deal with many kinds of threats. Aerial warfare is even more expansive, with many possible roles falling upon a single airplane (Air Dominance, Tactical Ground Attack, Strategic Area Bombing, Reconnaissance, Transport, Close Air Support, Anti-Ship, ect). Airplanes will spawn air defences, and then the never-ending leapfrog of who is more advanced at the moment will begin, to answer the question "Will the Bomber get Through?".

    So you will have noticed that all this entails quite a lot of work and development. Wich is why it is imperative that advancements be saved, and that lessons learned be published so that the general level of knowledge is equal for all who would wish to begin. Prized formulas, tactics, code and algorithms for various kinds of problems should be openly published after it has been "proven in combat" so to speak; or if you insist on secrecy, after something better comes along. A weapon made more for looks and "wow" than actual fighting, like a 153-prop Tiger II tank, would not fit in the scope, since all the contraptions have to relegate form to function more or less. Blowing up something efficiently, with minimal expense of energy is a much different science (and art) than building, or even destroying in style as many aim to.

    A dedicated server running an experimental game of this kind would be best in fleshing out exactly how best to proceed. Many paths can be chosen; from free-form (build it all yourself) to pre-arranged (standard, pre-set duped units available; little development to do; "mass produced") to fit different gamemodes. An obvious offshoot would be WW2, with the obligatory Western Europe "Occupied Normandy/Channel/Britain" map and setting. Here expression2 and missiles would be banned, perhaps only standard expression2's doing specific things would exist. But WW2 still had much attrition warfare in it, the beginning of the information age warfare.

    The standard scenario/gamemode i would propose is a "two-continents" map separated by sea, with some light fog limiting long-range visibility. The teams, BLUE and RED, begin by a period of peace where each side will try to create a force; now balancing of teams can also take place where veterans will help the weaker side. Once a 'war' begins, victory points are measured by player kills and props destroyed (for a lack of true whole-vehicle-kill counters for now). Prices can be put into props by a calculation of their weight and physical properties ($0.50 per weightunit of wood, for example), so that a resource system can be developed to expand the game.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events Funny Funny x 5Dumb Dumb x 2Informative Informative x 1 (list)

  2. Post #2
    Trans genders are gays with mental dis orders
    Dennab
    January 2012
    3,881 Posts
    pics?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events

  3. Post #3
    Gold Member
    Hentie's Avatar
    May 2010
    2,129 Posts
    Can you cut down on the story and give like
    the game mechanics?

    "Run and shoot people TDM."
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 2 (list)

  4. Post #4
    We Are No Idiots
    Aide's Avatar
    March 2010
    4,731 Posts
    Wall of text with no screenshots, code, and/or video. Doomed to not be developed or released.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 5 (list)

  5. Post #5
    boy i sure do love it when my title doesnt fit
    LuaChobo's Avatar
    December 2009
    6,417 Posts
    Doomed to not be read
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Australia Show Events Agree Agree x 11Funny Funny x 5 (list)

  6. Post #6
    Gromitooth's Avatar
    April 2011
    101 Posts
    Please tell me that you aren't the ideas guy, you need to pay people to get this gamemode done, and that's quite a bit of content.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events

  7. Post #7
    Gold Member
    Dennab
    February 2007
    13,269 Posts
    Please tell me that you aren't the ideas guy, you need to pay people to get this gamemode done, and that's quite a bit of content.
    I'm thinking
    A. It's the guy's dream scenario that he's just telling about to share his unobtainable vision and not expecting anything serious.
    B. He's an elaborate troll with hilarious satire reading material.
    C. He's just retarded beyond the point of no return
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Sweden Show Events Winner Winner x 1 (list)

  8. Post #8
    itty-bitty pretty kitty
    Dennab
    September 2008
    9,837 Posts
    True modern warfare would be the soldier sitting at base, with a rifle that he can't fire without explicit permission, probably cleaning the mess hall.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Agree Agree x 4 (list)

  9. Post #9
    cagoule's Avatar
    November 2007
    29 Posts
    I'm thinking
    A. It's the guy's dream scenario that he's just telling about to share his unobtainable vision and not expecting anything serious.
    B. He's an elaborate troll with hilarious satire reading material.
    C. He's just retarded beyond the point of no return
    That would be A. I think this, even developped 100%, would be quite 'retarded' for people the level of this forum.
    As in, people would go "So i'm supposed to just stand in front of this screen and push buttons? GHEEEY". It would require a level of discipline and wit that's just impossible to aspire to with the average kind of people who play DarkRP and pose ragdolls around.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 Canada Show Events Dumb Dumb x 3Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  10. Post #10
    itty-bitty pretty kitty
    Dennab
    September 2008
    9,837 Posts
    That would be A. I think this, even developped 100%, would be quite 'retarded' for people the level of this forum.
    As in, people would go "So i'm supposed to just stand in front of this screen and push buttons? GHEEEY". It would require a level of discipline and wit that's just impossible to aspire to with the average kind of people who play DarkRP and pose ragdolls around.
    Thanks for insulting us, you're doing a really good job of advertising your gamemode.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events

  11. Post #11
    Gromitooth's Avatar
    April 2011
    101 Posts
    That would be A. I think this, even developped 100%, would be quite 'retarded' for people the level of this forum.
    As in, people would go "So i'm supposed to just stand in front of this screen and push buttons? GHEEEY". It would require a level of discipline and wit that's just impossible to aspire to with the average kind of people who play DarkRP and pose ragdolls around.
    So...

    You're trolling? If so what the hell was the point of posting in the first place?
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events

  12. Post #12
    I love bestiality!
    a-cookie's Avatar
    May 2009
    4,832 Posts
    Yeah, we just idle about and play DarkRP all the time, totally. Not like people here have lives or anything.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events

  13. Post #13

    March 2012
    32 Posts
    tl;dr

    (User was banned for this post ("Why Reply? / Meme reply" - Asaratha))
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Windows 7 United States Show Events Dumb Dumb x 1 (list)