But that is entirely beside the point because you have failed to present a reason why this conspiracy was formed or carried out.
1) No they bloody don't, truthers try to make it look like a controlled demolition by only showing the last three seconds of the video, if you'd watch the whole thing and a controlled demolition you'd know it doesn't.
2) Two points: as has already been pointed out, those "explosion" sounds could very well have been the jumpers hitting the ground. Second: theres the fact that the building was burning out of control, these "explosions" could've been caused by fire damage.
3) Source? I've never heard that before.
2) Humans splatting into the pavement go BOOM? Okay. Explain to me how people died from severe body injuries in the lobby and basement of the twin towers long before they collapsed?
3) Maybe you should do some research, it's all there.
I'm not home but when I get home I'll post what I've got and the video of them doing it. Remember how there was still a skeleton facade left after the collapse? They were afraid it'd fall over whole they were searching for survivors so they had welders cut them and they were cut at an angle like that as is common practice so it'd fall into the pile.
I understand how people would think suspiciously about the September 11th Attacks, but when you actually look into the facts and find the real answers to the questions you realize it's not so sketchy.
I'm not going to argue against every point made by every single conspirator out there. Two Boeing 767's and about 40,000 liters of jet fuel did extreme damage to the towers. Also, in order for the towers to have fallen the fire wouldn't have even needed to melt the steel - it only needed to be hot enough for it to lose some of its structural strength, which of course it was.
There were no demolition charges, for Christ's sake it was not controlled.
All of this "inside job" bullshit has been debunked numerous times by numerous people; it's just ignorance. If you're trying that hard to find a reason to hate your government, you're better off saying the JFK assassination was an inside job. Really.
People who claim "LOL 911 TO START WAR TO GET OIL" need to look at the price of waging a war. For the price of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US could'ave bought all the oil there, like, twice.
A small percentage will go in salary to the soldiers, the rest goes to private corporations who manufacture and supply millitary equipment and to oil companies who supply fuel.
These companies are American companies, many of which people like George Bush own a share of.
watch at 2 hours 10 mins 35 seconds. watch the whole video even, you may learn something new!
2. Please explain how 9/11 was a contributing factor in the Iraq War.
Governments can't just go to war without the support of the people, they have to justify it somehow. Not only so their own people are happy but also so other countries don't get upset about it.
As I have said before lookup "Operation Northwoods". The CIA planned to stage a terrorist attack on Americans and blame it on Cuba. JFK was pretty much the only guy who said no. The file became declassified in 1997. It is on the internet and you can read it in full gory detail.
Not saying that's how it played out, but it wouldn't be the first time a governing body used the ignorance of a nation's people to advance their interests.
it also wouldn't be the first time the United States government was in bed with shady characters.
like how we sold weapons to Iran in the 80's to fund death squads in Nicaragua,
and gave money to militants in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets.
Okay, how about this: The real world isn't Modern Warfare 2. No one would ever be fucking retarded enough to do a terrorist attack on their own nation for the sake of starting a war where you can easily find a whole lot of other reasons to do so if you really want a war. Which you don't. Because wars are expensive. Only world wars are profitable, and as opposed to what conspiracy-fags want to believe, Afghanistan is a mid-level insurgency, not a world war 3.
Money is not a hard concept to fathom anyway I mean seriously. If one person spends a lot of money, another person recieves it. It really is that simple.
66,000 > 2,571.
There isn't anything conspiracy related about those deaths. Most of them were caused by the severe burns people got when jet fuel ran down the elevator banks and blew the doors out of the lobby and basement dousing people waiting for them in fire.
And yes, I can get you testimony and examples of Jumpers going BOOM they sound like explosions when they hit. They were really loud and you -felt- them.
Also regarding the 'thermite cuts'
2 - Soon after the planes impacted, shit loads of debris, fuel, and probably bodies plummeted to the bottom of the lift shafts causing destruction on a large scale at the bottom. How is this difficult to envisage? I mean, what the hell are you suggesting happened there? Government agents went around with baseball bats hitting people?
3 - Yeah provide a source. I don't think we're going to be convinced by you saying "lolol NIST violated laws"
If someone can explain why a government conspiracy involves crashing a plane into the PENTAGON of all things, then I'll believe any conspiracy theory about anything.
9/11 didn't just involve the World Trade Center -- there were two other planes, people.
I'm not a US citizen. I fail to see what this accomplished if it was an inside job? It seems like the most pointless conspiracy ever.
Has the argument about how Thermite is naturally created in the presence of heat, iron and aluminum already made?
This could be the premise to go war and establish a base in Afganistan. Military presence and strategic benefit (keep eyes on Iran, Russia, China), Economic benefit (1 trillion worth of minerals and 6th largest reserve of rare earth minerals), Ideological benefit (US see's Islamic governments as threats).
Interesting read : http://www.thedebate.org/thedebate/afghanistan.asp
There's no questioning this was simply a terrorist attack. What angers me is how the governments have used these events to have more control over its citizens.
If you believe your Government tell's you the 100% truth. Well then you are very naive.
There are many holes in the official story of 9 / 11. That's why people are asking questions not because they love a good conspiracy.
If the Government provided answers then it would all be over but they don't. Take the Pentagon for example. People had to go through the courts for years under the Freedom Of Information Act requesting the video footage on what happened there. After about 5 years they eventually release 5 frames from a CCTV camera that doesn't even show a plane. The Pentagon is covered in cameras and if an American Airline plane hit then it would be on tape somewhere.
It is the denial of information that makes people suspect their Government and quite rightly too. Their history of lying also adds fuel to the fire. You have to remember that the people at the top live in a completely different world to us peasants. What may sound terrible and inconcievable to you can just be necessary buisness to them.
What you perceive as holes "the slanted cut metal", "WTC 7 building" etc can be answered with things called logic.
Just because you're ignorant and just because you don't know how to look into things properly does NOT mean they are holes. it just means you suck.
There has not been one a piece of evidence presented by truthers, EVER that hasn't been explained with a simple answer. There ARE no holes.
The majority of people on the planet believe there is a magical wizard in the sky called god. They believe it because authority has convinced them of it and they have never openly and subjectively questioned it. Religion is just a man made system to control the masses and people buy it.
The point is that I don't just buy into something because the "good guys" say it is so. I explore all avenues before I even begin to draw any conclusions.
As said before it is fact that government have planned such things in the past in order to further their agenda. That is an indisputable fact which you can't deny. If they have planned such things in the past it is stupid to believe that they wouldn't do so again.
I don't say 9/11 was definately an inside job, all I say is there are unanswered questions and until they are I won't just accept what authority would have me believe to be true.
Why the fuck do you think they have more than 5 frames of video of the crash?
Why would you believe that the most secure building in the world would only have 5 frames of footage? That place is covered in cameras that in 2001 would be capable of recording full video. There is no way they wouldn't have more footage of what happened that day yet we aren't allowed to see it.